Tillage is back for weed management, but not as we knew it
Author: Toni Somes | Date: 24 Nov 2016
- Herbicide-only, no-till systems have encouraged the proliferation of certain weeds, and continuing to exclusively use no-till will support their evolution.
- Tillage was demonstrated across four DAF experiments over four years to mostly reduce weed seed emergence, especially in small-seeded weeds like fleabane.
- Some light tillage treatments could also increase seed germination, depending on the season.
- Researchers are working on the optimum balance between the management advantages of no-till and the weed reduction offered by tillage through development of robotic systems that interchangeably use both principles.
All that is old is new again: vinyl records, paper books, tillage.
After being apparently consigned to history by the clear advantages of reduced-tillage systems, tillage has reappeared in growers’ thinking as it becomes apparent that certain weeds are prospering under herbicide-only management.
If it comes back, though, the new tillage won’t be your father’s tillage.
Min-till has amply demonstrated that the less soil disturbance in cropping systems, the better. The future of weed control looks to lie in technologies that integrate the best of chemical control - like weed detection systems – coupled with on-the-spot, strategic tilling.
Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (DAF) principal research scientist Dr Michael Widderick says what is clear from his research, which is supported by the Grains Research Development Corporation (GRDC), is that continuing to rely wholly on chemical control is not an option.
“The spread of no-till farming has meant that almost all weed control now revolves around herbicides,” Dr Widderick said.
“As a result, the weed spectrum in the northern grain region has changed to favour herbicide-resistant, surface-germinating weeds like common sowthistle, fleabane and feathertop Rhodes grass.
“If we continue to rely only on herbicides for weed control, we continue to favour the evolution of these weeds, and other herbicide-resistant species will inevitably appear.
“The challenge is to identify ways of using tillage that retain the benefits of zero-till while addressing weed management issues.”
Tillage presents a mixed bag of benefits and problems to graingrowers. Aside from the damage it causes to soil structure, its effects differ markedly on different weed species.
Burying seed can prevent weed germination, but it generally also preserves seed viability. In one DAF trial, virtually all barnyard grass and livergrass seed became unviable after two years on the inhospitable soil surface, but at least 10 per cent of seed survived when buried at a depth of 10cm.
To assess the effects of tillage on weed ecology, DAF have conducted a series of four GRDC-supported field experiments since 2011. The studies looked at weed emergence under zero-till compared to treatments using harrows, a Gyral cultivator, offset discs and one-way discs.
Seeds of awnless barnyard grass, feathertop Rhodes grass, windmill grass, liverseed grass, common sowthistle and flaxleaf fleabane were sown on the soil surface before tillage was used.
Small glass beads were used to track the degree of soil inversion and seed movement under different tillage methods. As expected, the greater the tillage intensity, the more beads buried at depth (5-20cm).
Overall, Dr Widderick said, tillage had the potential to reduce the emergence of all weed species compared to emergence under zero-till.
Tillage treatments proved most effective on small-seeded species like fleabane and common sowthistle. And the greater the tillage intensity, the lower the subsequent weed emergence across all species.
Thus, the one-way disc, the implement causing the greatest amount of soil inversion, also proved the most effective at halting seed emergence.
However, the results were complicated by different results in different seasons.
In one experiment at DAF’s Hermitage Research Facility, the harrow and Gyral treatments increased emergence over zero-till; the following year, the Gyral treatment also increased emergence.
This was a result of simple weed ecology, Dr Widderick explained.
Both these seasons started hot and dry. Under zero-till, weed seeds near the soil surface were punished by the conditions and lost their viability. The harrows and Gyral machine buried seed at enough depth to preserve a high level of viability, but not deep enough to stop emergence of viable seed when the season broke.
Researchers also looked at the effects of covering disced treatments with a second pass using the Gyral.
As a rule, the second pass tended to bring back seed deep-buried by the discs closer to the surface, so the treatment increased seedling emergence over those that used only discs.
Considering all the data, two things are evident, Dr Widderick said. Continued sole reliance on no-till is not an option, and tillage can reduce weed seed germination.
He believes that answers to the weed challenge lie midway between these two facts. That may mean harnessing technologies like robotics to deliver tillage only where necessary.
This field is already being explored by researchers.
“For example, we may see robot rigs equipped with weed detection-type sensors and dual-equipped with the ability to selectively apply herbicide or tillage treatments,” Dr Widderick said.
“If the unit detects a grass weed, it may apply tillage. If the robot detects a broad leaf weed, it may apply herbicide.”
He describes this as “targeted tillage”. If robotic systems are capable of delivering it, tillage may yet return to Australian paddocks – but not via the one-way ploughs rusting behind many farm sheds.
Mark Hodder, DAF Media & Communication Officer
07 3087 8576
Toni Somes, Senior Consultant Cox Inall Communications
0427 878 387
GRDC Project Code UQ00062, UA00124, UWA00171
GRDC Project code: UQ00062, UA00124, UWA00171
Was this page helpful?