Summer surveillance of Russian wheat aphid habits and habitat
Author: Sharon Watt | Date: 17 Dec 2018
Australian researchers have embarked on a mission to better understand the role of weeds and volunteer cereals – known as the green bridge – in promoting the survival and spread of the nation’s newest broadacre crop pest, Russian wheat aphid (RWA).
Through a new Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) investment, scientists are conducting active field research at more than 100 surveillance sites throughout South Australia, Victoria, Tasmania and New South Wales this summer to investigate how RWA survives between winter cropping seasons.
This knowledge is considered pivotal in determining the risk of infestation and potential damage ahead of each new cropping season, as well as aiding RWA management planning and development of cultural controls.
First identified in South Australia in 2016, RWA is now present in many cropping areas of SA, Victoria, Tasmania and NSW. More recently, it has been detected as far north as Coonabarabran and the Liverpool Plains in NSW. RWA has not been detected in Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Queensland.
Apart from understanding what role the green bridge plays in supporting RWA populations over the summer, the two-year GRDC RWA research investment is also seeking to determine the regional production risk posed by RWA and the economic thresholds that will guide growers in effective management of RWA, taking into account growing regions, crop varieties and climatic conditions.
The collaborative investment, “Determining regional risks and economic thresholds for Russian wheat aphid in Australia”, is being led by the South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), a division of Primary Industries and Regions SA, which is conducting research in partnership with sustainable agriculture research organisation cesar. Operation of the field trials also involves a number of farming systems groups.
Elia Pirtle from cesar, who features in a new GRDC video and podcast about the green bridge work being undertaken, says identifying RWA food sources and favoured weed hosts will be a particular focus of this summer’s green bridge surveillance.
Dr Pirtle says samples are being taken from paddocks, fence lines and road sides, and relevant information being recorded includes crops and grass species present, whether there are irrigated paddocks or waterways nearby, site topography, RWA growth stage, and the presence or absence of parasitoid wasps and beneficial insects in the sample.
“At an irrigated site we visited recently, there was a lot of healthy-looking barley grass and the site was swarming with aphids,” Dr Pirtle says. “But it was also swarming with beneficials – there was more lady bug larvae than I’ve ever seen in one spot and they were really going to town on the aphids.”
The work doesn’t stop there. At cesar’s Melbourne research facility, a risk forecasting tool is being developed to interpret the field data to help growers and their advisers plan RWA management strategies at the start of each season.
“We are creating interactive risk maps using real time data that predict the risk of RWA distribution and abundance into the next season. It’s a way of leveraging knowledge about the green bridge into useful tools that will help growers make crop protection decisions before, during, and after the season,” says cesar’s James Maino.
“You will be able to see broad differences between the States and can zoom in further to see what specific risk exists for a particular region, as well as see data generated by the project on absence and presence of RWA detected during our field work.”
In the meantime, growers are being encouraged to perform their own RWA surveillance over the coming months.
Weeds and volunteer cereals harbouring aphids may not necessarily show symptoms of infestation typically found in crops and populations are likely to be smaller at this time of the year, so Dr Pirtle advises growers to closely inspect grasses by unfurling leaves and checking inside partially emerged heads, paying particular attention to annual weedy barley grass.
Growers should also look for signs of predatory insect activity, such as mummified aphid bodies resulting from parasitic wasps laying eggs inside the aphid.
Data from this summer’s surveillance work by cesar will be combined with findings from research partner SARDI which has been replicating the green bridge study in SA, as well as conductingseparate field trials in RWA-affected regions to measure yield loss on different host crops growing under a range of environmental conditions to develop regional economic thresholds.
The new two-year research effort builds on previous GRDC investments conducted by SARDI and cesar which focused onseasonal factors influencingRWA population growth, biotype confirmation, varietal susceptibility, damage and yield loss, and chemical efficacy.
The current project will culminate with an update of the GRDC RWA Tips & Tactics guide. Growers and advisers will also have the opportunity to keep up to date with the research through fact sheets, research updates, webinars and trial site visits.
In the meantime, further information on RWA management is contained in the Russian Wheat Aphid: Tactics for Future Control publication, as well as I SPY, a comprehensive crop insect identification manual. A RWA resource portal hosted by cesar is available at here.
Growers and advisers are encouraged to report occurrences of RWA to the GRDC’s PestFacts services and to take advantage of pest identification services provided by cesar and SARDI through the National Pest Information Service.
Suspected RWA detections in currently unaffected States should be reported to the Exotic Plant Pest Hotline on 1800 084 881. These reports will aid in improving understanding of RWA range and rate of spread.
Elia Pirtle, cesar
(03) 9349 4723
Sharon Watt, GRDC
Jessica Lye, cesar
(03) 9349 4723
GRDC Project code: CES00004, DAS000170, 9174815
Was this page helpful?