Think strategically before ripping into sandy soils
Author: Sharon Watt | Date: 03 Apr 2019
Grain growers are advised to understand the yield-limiting constraints of their sandy soils before undertaking deep ripping of paddocks ahead of the 2019 sowing season.
While deep ripping offers potential to improve grain yields on compacted sandy soils, experts say it does not necessarily solve issues with all soil types.
CSIRO senior research scientist Lynne Macdonald, who leads the Grains Research and Development Corporation’s (GRDC) ‘Increasing production on sandy soils in low and medium rainfall areas of the southern region’ research investment, says it is important to target ripping practices to those sands where hard or compacted layers are the primary issue.
“Where acidity, water repellency or subsoil toxicity are primary constraints, other amelioration practices may also be needed for the full benefits from ripping to be achieved,” Dr Macdonald says.
“Ripping sandy soils aims to remove physical constraints to root growth which result from compaction due to machinery trafficking, animal trampling or natural consolidation (cementing) due to drying, but ripping alone does not fully address other soil constraints such as acidity, subsurface toxicities or non-wetting.”
Dr Macdonald says identifying and prioritising the key constraints on sandy soils can be difficult.
“Assessing where crop roots stop growing can be a useful first indicator of the depth of relevant constraints. However, it is important to look beyond the depth of rooting and consider issues that might be present deeper in the profile.”
Hard and compacted layers can be identified in sands by digging a pit and looking and feeling for changes in soil structure, using a simple push probe to feel for hard layers or by using a penetrometer.
Soil moisture has a big impact on how hard the soil will feel, with most soils hardening on drying. Push probes and penetrometers should be used after significant rain when the soil moisture profile is full. This will help to avoid misleading penetrometer readings caused by lack of moisture alone.
Dr Macdonald says the depth of hard and compacted layers varies across the sandy soil landscape. Ripping to depths deeper than necessary is very costly due to fuel requirements (for example, doubling the depth may quadruple the power needed).
“It is important to look beyond the depth of rooting to identify how deep the physical constraint continues,” she says. “Targeting the ripping depth to either past, or at least well into, the compacted layer will help maximise rooting depth.”
Acidity-related constraints can stunt root growth, limit nutrient availability or lead to toxicity effects. The full yield benefits of ripping are unlikely to be achieved if acidity goes untreated, according to Dr Macdonald.
Threshold levels for soil pH (in water) are above 5.5 in the top 10 centimetres, and above 4.8 in the subsurface soil.
Acid layers can occur in a relatively thin zone that prevents root growth, and can be missed by traditional 0-10 cm soil sampling. Applying pH indicator dyes (available from hardware or gardening stores) can be an effective first step in identifying if there is an acid problem, and where in the profile it occurs.
“Where pH falls below the threshold targets, a liming plan should be part of a long-term amelioration strategy,” Dr Macdonald says. “Yield benefits to ripping alone may be limited where subsurface acidity constraints are not addressed.”
Water repellencyis common in sandy soils, leading to uneven soil moisture and poor establishment. Although providing some surface disruption in the year of implementation, most ripping practices do not provide enough surface mixing to overcome repellency for multiple years.
“Rather than ripping alone, repellency is better addressed through deep ploughing approaches that mix the repellent sand to dilute and/or bury the problem layer,” Dr Macdonald says.
“Where available, clay can provide a permanent solution to overcoming water repellency. Specific delving and mixing tine designs are required to effectively mix the surface soil layers, and can be applied with/without claying practices to overcome water repellency.
“If repellency is not overcome, the full yield benefits of ripping are unlikely to be achieved as issues of water infiltration, establishment and erosion risks will remain.”
Dr Macdonald says subsoil toxicities and nutrient deficienciesexist within sandy soil landscapes in the southern region and can change rapidly with topography. A subsoil ‘health’ check can be useful in enabling growers to avoid areas where deeper rooting depth may not bring yield returns due to subsoil toxicities.
“Diagnosing subsoil issues involves assessing pH, electrical conductivity, exchangeable sodium, boron or chloride and essential plant nutrients, and various packages are offered from commercial laboratories.”
Growers are also encouraged to consider the risk of erosion: “Ripping will loosen and soften the soil profile to depth, flattening and unanchoring standing stubble,” Dr Macdonald says.
“The reduction in soil cover, coupled with the loosened surface, will leave ripped areas prone to wind erosion. Rolling after deep ripping will help to consolidate the soil surface but a lack of standing stubble will make the site vulnerable.”
A successful ripping operation is likely to increase the potential of crops and pastures for several years and therefore management of ripped areas should be adjusted to match the new potential yield.
“For example, without higher N inputs the crop yields may not fully respond to the benefits from deep ripping,” Dr Macdonald says.
A suite of GRDC YouTube videos on soil constraints can be viewed here
Lynne Macdonald, CSIRO
08 8273 8111
Sharon Watt, GRDC
0409 675 100
GRDC Project code: CSP00203
Was this page helpful?