Barley varieties and their management

| Date: 14 Feb 2008

Paper McMullen Guy Barley

Guy McMullen1, Neil Fettell2, Stephen Morphett1, John Sturgess3 and Kym McIntyre3 1Tamworth Agricultural Institute and 2Condobolin Research Station, NSW DPI. 3 John Sturgess and Kym McIntyre, Hermitage Research Station, QDPI&F

• A range of barley varieties are being evaluated under a range of agronomic practices
• There was little yield interaction between nitrogen management and varieties. Early planting times significantly out yielded later plantings at most sites. There were some varietal interactions with planting times.
• Preliminary findings from planting depth trials have indicated that varietal interactions may be important when considering moisture seeking. Overall though deep sowing did not cause large yield reduction in 2007.
• Hindmarsh has performed well in 2007 and recent NVT trials. It may become an important feed variety and is under evaluation as a potential malting variety. There are also some elite lines coming through BBA nodes that have potential in the northern grains region.

Background

Barley is the second most important winter cereal in northern NSW and Queensland. Historically about 30% of this production meets malt specifications, predominantly domestic malt, while 70% is used as feed. Barley production will need to increase significantly in the future to meet projected end use demand. The continued growth in the feedlot and pork industry in northern NSW and Queensland will also drive demand for quality feed barley. The concentration of domestic brewing operations in southern Queensland will further develop a market for domestic malt which will require consistent production and grain quality. The relatively small export malt market demand may also increase in the future with new varieties becoming available and more flexible marketing arrangements.

There has recently been major changes in the structure of barley breeding in Australia and also the relatively new NVT system. These changes may reduce the amount of time that it takes for new varieties to become available to growers but could restrict local agronomic information at the time of release. Since 2002 there have been 15 new varieties (8 feed and 7 malt) released nationally, with varying improvements in yield, disease resistance and malting quality over the standard varieties.

GRDC has recently funded barley agronomy projects in each of its panel areas. Each of these projects aims to assist in the uptake of appropriate new barley varieties that deliver both yield and quality to benefit growers and end-users. In the northern region the project is a collaboration between QLD DPI&F and NSW DPI.

Variety characteristics and performance

·         Capstan High yielding feed variety with mid to late maturity. Capstan has excellent grain yield potential, broad adaptation in medium to high rainfall environments and is resistant to CCN while being moderately susceptible to leaf scald, powdery mildew, leaf rust and spot form of net blotch. Capstan has short, stiff straw with excellent head retention and would be suitable for growers targeting very high potential yields.
·         NRB03470 A high yielding quick maturing line which will be go into commercial malt evaluation in 2008. NRB03470 has moderate levels of foliar disease resistance and maintains very good grain size across the region.
·         Fitzroy (VB9926). A high yielding medium to medium late maturing malting variety with improved disease resistance over Gairdner, and excellent grain size. Fitzroy is a semi dwarf plant with good seedling vigour, is of medium height and has good straw strength. Fitzroy is best suited to the northern NSW and Queensland barley growing areas. Best results will be achieved in more favourable environments where it should outperform Gairdner as a malting variety. Fitzroy has improved levels of disease resistance compared to Gairdner to all foliar diseases except powdery mildew where it is equal.
·         Fleet (WI3804) Fleet is a new CCN resistant feed barley developed by the University of Adelaide. Fleet exhibits an excellent disease resistance profile, good physical grain quality, and a 5% yield advantage over Barque, the current dominant feed variety in southern Australia. In northern NSW and southern QLD Fleet has shown weak straw in some high yielding situations. Fleet is available through ABB Grain and the Australian Field Crops Association (AFCA).
·         Grout (NRB01001) Grout is a high yielding, quick maturing variety with improved grain size, suited to the northern NSW and Queensland grain growing regions. Exhibits excellent grain size and maintains this grain size advantage in both high and low yielding conditions. It is a quick maturing variety with a vigorous seedling and high tillering ability with erect growth habit. Grout is semi tall with moderate levels of standability, better than Grimmett and similar to Mackay. Grout has good levels of resistance to the major foliar diseases encountered in the northern grain growing region, particularly powdery mildew, net form of net blotch and leaf rust.
·         Hindmarsh(VB0324). Semi-dwarf Dash derivative with excellent grain plumpness and high hectolitre weight. Early maturing, high yielding feed variety suited to low-medium rainfall environments. Hindmarsh has performed well across a wide range of sites in QLD, NSW, Vic and SA. Resistant to CCN, powdery mildew, leaf scald and NFNB. Susceptible to SFNB. It is expected that Hindmarsh will enter into malt accreditation in 2008 with provisional classification in 2009 depending on commercial scale testiog. Bred by Vic DPI, Hindmarsh is available through AWB Seeds.
·         WI3416 is a medium maturing line which has shown very good yield potential and grain size. It has good levels of foliar disease resistance, it is a taller type and has weaker straw than Gairdner and Fitzroy. WI3416 is currently under going commercial malt evaluation.
 
Table 1: Across sites and years analysis for yield in main season trials in NE and NW zones of NSW.

Variety
NE Region
NW Region
 
Yield as %Gairdner
(no. trials)
Yield as %Gairdner
(no. trials)
Binalong
107
(36)
107
(28)
Buloke
104
(9)
107
(15)
Capstan
108
(7)
109
(11)
Dash
110
(10)
110
(9)
Fitzroy
108
(21)
108
(19)
Fleet
109
(5)
113
(9)
Gairdner
100
(35)
100
(28)
Grimmett
95
(36)
97
(20)
Grout
104
(26)
109
(24)
Hindmarsh
107
(2)
111
(4)
Kaputar
101
(36)
107
(22)
Keel
104
(5)
111
(15)
Mackay
106
(36)
107
(28)
Schooner
93
(33)
99
(23)
Skiff
102
(21)
106
(18)
Tantangara
104
(36)
105
(28)
Vlamingh
104
(5)
107
(8)
Yarra
110
(9)
112
(11)
 
Table 2: Grain yield data (% of trial mean) from selected NVT sites in northern NSW and southern QLD in 2007.
 
NSW
QLD
 
N/E
N/W
SEQ
SWQ
Variety
Tamw’th
Yallaroi
Tulloona
Goon’la
Oakey
Dalby
Chinch.
Goondi.
Binalong
93
85
90
69
66
80
83
80
Fitzroy
96
90
98
82
88
74
78
79
Flagship
97
115
74
109
119
109
116
112
Fleet
107
134
124
115
103
113
115
129
Gairdner
87
64
70
71
111
84
86
114
Grimmett
95
85
88
52
92
106
113
80
Grout
109
121
112
148
123
129
128
104
Hindmarsh
118
126
118
145
127
119
113
129
Kaputar
96
100
96
123
88
103
108
99
Mackay
107
78
88
61
101
108
120
90
Roe
109
118
130
135
118
128
128
97
Skiff
90
116
77
125
123
109
96
116
Vlamingh
106
95
101
90
91
111
105
108
Site Mean (t/ha)
5.71
1.06
3.23
1.24
1.08
2.38
2.93
1.55
CV (%)
4.55
7.88
5.76
8.70
10.70
7.63
9.23
11.00
LSD (%)
8
13
9
15
18
12
15
17
 
Table 3: Grain quality data (screenings <2.2mm and retention >2.5 mm sieves) from selected NVT sites in northern grains region in 2007.
 
NSW
QLD
 
N/E
N/W
SWQ
SEQ
 
Tamworth
Tulloona
Chinchilla
Oakey
Variety
<2.2 mm
>2.5 mm
<2.2 mm
>2.5 mm
<2.2 mm
>2.5 mm
<2.2 mm
>2.5 mm
Binalong
37.2
18.6
30.4
19.5
32.9
3.9
2.3
33.2
Fitzroy
19.1
42.6
12.1
52.2
35.5
10.2
0.5
57.5
Flagship
11.4
50.0
8.3
64.4
32.9
2.0
0.6
50.3
Fleet
4.8
77.1
8.4
55.3
4.5
23.3
0.4
79.2
Gairdner
41.8
15.5
9.2
38.2
49.2
4.6
1.1
19.8
Grimmett
18.4
36.8
7.8
52.3
25.7
6.0
1.6
32.0
Grout
9.6
58.1
10.0
48.8
18.9
4.9
1.3
16.6
Hannan
5.8
67.6
9.4
59.4
26.3
5.0
0.2
64.0
Hindmarsh
5.6
70.2
8.0
63.4
16.9
5.2
1.0
55.4
Kaputar
23.8
20.2
48.6
9.2
32.0
4.1
2.0
13.5
Mackay
25.1
27.3
16.1
22.9
36.3
1.9
1.5
36.1
Roe
4.6
84.1
3.8
81.6
2.5
44.3
0.3
80.5
Skiff
42.1
11.3
36.0
9.5
41.3
3.0
1.0
19.9
Vlamingh
7.0
58.1
4.1
67.6
12.6
6.9
0.9
68.9
 

 

2007 Agronomy Trials

In 2007 a range of trials were established to investigate the performance of standard varieties, recently released lines and elite material from the nodes of Barley Breeding Australia.
 
Table 4: 2007 Barley agronomy trials and locations.

Trial
Location
Entries
Main treatments
Phenology
Tamworth, Moree, Walgett, Hermitage, Goondiwindi, Roma, Emerald, Toowoomba.
 
5 planting dates
Nitrogen Management
Jondaryan, Hermitage, Yallaroi, Breeza
Fitzroy, Fleet, Gairdner, Grout, Hindmarsh, Mackay,
NRB03470, WI3416-1572
2 planting dates x 3 N levels with 1 split application
Planting depth
Jondaryan, Hermitage, Yallaroi, Breeza
EGA Gregory(w), Ellison(w),
Fitzroy, Fleet, Gairdner, Grimmett,
Grout, Hindmarsh,
Mackay, NRB03470,
Skiff, WI3416-1572
2 planting dates x 3 planting depths
Grazing Barley
Tamworth
Grout, Mackay, Dictator, Grimmett, Fitzroy, Skiff, Binalong, Gairdner
Urambie, Yambla, EGA Wedgetail(w), Gregory(w)
2 planting dates x ‘grazed’ and ‘ungrazed’
Collaborative trials
 
 
 
Seeding Rate
(Southern Barley Agronomy)
Gilgandra
Schooner, Gairdner, Baudin, Buloke, Flagship
Hindmarsh, Fitzroy, WI3416, Grout, Vlamingh
5 seeding rates
Nitrogen Rate
(Southern Barley Agronomy)
Gilgandra

Schooner, Gairdner, Baudin, Buloke, Flagship
Hindmarsh, Fitzroy, WI3416, Grout, Vlamingh

4 N rates
Canopy Management
(NGA0002)
Yallaroi
Skiff, Grout, Fitzroy, Ventura
3 plant pop. x 4 N treatment

Results

Planting Date and Nitrogen Management

Marketing of barley grain, especially for malt markets, is strongly dependent on grain quality characteristics. In some cases it may be more economically viable to target high yielding feed varieties. A series of trials were established to investigate varietal interactions with N management and planting date.

 

Table 5: Effect of N management on grain yield (t/ha) (results averaged across varieties).

Nitrogen Management
Hermitage
Jondaryan
Yallaroi
Breeza
low N
4.85
2.45
2.26
3.88
‘Optimal' N
5.05
3.09
2.08
4.06
‘Optimal' N split
5.01
2.59
2.13
3.86
high N
4.93
3.43
1.84
3.90
 
Table 6: Effect of planting time on grain yield (t/ha) from N management trials (yield averaged across N treatments.

 
Yallaroi
Breeza
Jondaryan
Hermitage
Variety
Early
Main
Early
Main
Early
Main
Early
Main
Fitzroy
2.53
1.08
 
4.12
3.82
1.92
4.92
5.31
Fleet
2.98
2.01
 
3.40
4.13
2.40
4.63
4.95
Gairdner
2.00
0.67
 
4.01
3.54
1.82
4.19
4.94
Grout
2.87
1.92
 
3.48
3.26
1.74
4.93
4.10
Hindmarsh
3.27
2.00
 
3.93
3.26
2.49
4.92
5.04
Mackay
2.24
0.74
 
4.38
3.78
1.91
4.66
5.84
NRB03470
2.90
1.39
 
4.09
4.00
2.26
4.67
6.12
WI3416-1572
2.96
1.68
 
3.98
3.66
2.26
4.88
5.26
 

When considering the results from N management trials it is important to consider the influence that both yield and quality have on the final gross margin, especially when comparing feed and malt varieties. This comparison will be available at the Update.

Planting Depth

Timely planting is a key component of optimising grain yield and quality. In some seasons, moisture seeking or deep sowing is a tool that growers use to ensure timely planting. There is a significant level of variation between the coleoptile length of barley varieties, an important factor in emerging from depth (Figure 1).

 

 

 

Figure 1: Effect of seed source and seed treatment with triadimenol on coleoptile length of a range of barley varieties harvested from 2 sites (Donna Hocroft, QLD DPI&F).

 

There are a range of factors that determine the ability of a plant to emerge from deep sowing including seed size, seed source, seed treatments, soil condition and temperature can all play an important role. Some of the effects of deep sowing can be delayed emergence, poor establishment, reduced early vigour, increased disease susceptibility or reduced grain yield.

In 2007 a series of preliminary trials were sown to investigate the ability of some varieties to emerge from 3 planting depths. Despite poor plant establishment at some sites deeper plantings did not results in large yield reductions in 2/3 trials (Table 7). The compensatory capacity of barley enabled yield potential to be maintained in 2007, even at high yielding sites.

 
Table 7: Effect of planting depth on grain yield in northern NSW and southern QLD.
Planting Depth (cm)
Breeza
Yallaroi
Hermitage
5
4.08
1.75
4.96
10
4.14
1.77
4.91
15
3.88
1.72
5.01
 

The effect of grazing on grain recovery from a range of barley and wheat varieties was assessed in 2007. There was no interaction between grazing and grain recovery, even in short season varieties. Grain yield loss was greater at later plantings with no significant decline in early sown crops (Figure 2).

 

 Figure 2: Effect of planting time and grazing on grain recovery of barley (averaged across varieties)

Figure 2: Effect of planting time and grazing on grain recovery of barley (averaged across varieties)

 

Contact details

Dr. Guy McMullen
NSW DPI
Ph: 02 6763 1100
 
John Sturgess
DPI&F (Qld)
Ph: 07 4660 3614
 
Kym McIntyre
DPI&F (Qld)
Ph: 07 46603611