Barley varieties and their management
| Date: 14 Feb 2008
Guy McMullen1, Neil Fettell2, Stephen Morphett1, John Sturgess3 and Kym McIntyre3 1Tamworth Agricultural Institute and 2Condobolin Research Station, NSW DPI. 3 John Sturgess and Kym McIntyre, Hermitage Research Station, QDPI&F
• A range of barley varieties are being evaluated under a range of agronomic practices
• There was little yield interaction between nitrogen management and varieties. Early planting times significantly out yielded later plantings at most sites. There were some varietal interactions with planting times.
• Preliminary findings from planting depth trials have indicated that varietal interactions may be important when considering moisture seeking. Overall though deep sowing did not cause large yield reduction in 2007.
• Hindmarsh has performed well in 2007 and recent NVT trials. It may become an important feed variety and is under evaluation as a potential malting variety. There are also some elite lines coming through BBA nodes that have potential in the northern grains region.
Background
Barley is the second most important winter cereal in northern NSW and Queensland. Historically about 30% of this production meets malt specifications, predominantly domestic malt, while 70% is used as feed. Barley production will need to increase significantly in the future to meet projected end use demand. The continued growth in the feedlot and pork industry in northern NSW and Queensland will also drive demand for quality feed barley. The concentration of domestic brewing operations in southern Queensland will further develop a market for domestic malt which will require consistent production and grain quality. The relatively small export malt market demand may also increase in the future with new varieties becoming available and more flexible marketing arrangements.
There has recently been major changes in the structure of barley breeding in Australia and also the relatively new NVT system. These changes may reduce the amount of time that it takes for new varieties to become available to growers but could restrict local agronomic information at the time of release. Since 2002 there have been 15 new varieties (8 feed and 7 malt) released nationally, with varying improvements in yield, disease resistance and malting quality over the standard varieties.
GRDC has recently funded barley agronomy projects in each of its panel areas. Each of these projects aims to assist in the uptake of appropriate new barley varieties that deliver both yield and quality to benefit growers and end-users. In the northern region the project is a collaboration between QLD DPI&F and NSW DPI.
Variety characteristics and performance
Variety
|
NE Region
|
NW Region
|
||
|
Yield as %Gairdner
(no. trials)
|
Yield as %Gairdner
(no. trials)
|
||
Binalong
|
107
|
(36)
|
107
|
(28)
|
Buloke
|
104
|
(9)
|
107
|
(15)
|
Capstan
|
108
|
(7)
|
109
|
(11)
|
Dash
|
110
|
(10)
|
110
|
(9)
|
Fitzroy
|
108
|
(21)
|
108
|
(19)
|
Fleet
|
109
|
(5)
|
113
|
(9)
|
Gairdner
|
100
|
(35)
|
100
|
(28)
|
Grimmett
|
95
|
(36)
|
97
|
(20)
|
Grout
|
104
|
(26)
|
109
|
(24)
|
Hindmarsh
|
107
|
(2)
|
111
|
(4)
|
Kaputar
|
101
|
(36)
|
107
|
(22)
|
Keel
|
104
|
(5)
|
111
|
(15)
|
Mackay
|
106
|
(36)
|
107
|
(28)
|
Schooner
|
93
|
(33)
|
99
|
(23)
|
Skiff
|
102
|
(21)
|
106
|
(18)
|
Tantangara
|
104
|
(36)
|
105
|
(28)
|
Vlamingh
|
104
|
(5)
|
107
|
(8)
|
Yarra
|
110
|
(9)
|
112
|
(11)
|
|
NSW
|
QLD
|
||||||
|
N/E
|
N/W
|
SEQ
|
SWQ
|
||||
Variety
|
Tamw’th
|
Yallaroi
|
Tulloona
|
Goon’la
|
Oakey
|
Dalby
|
Chinch.
|
Goondi.
|
Binalong
|
93
|
85
|
90
|
69
|
66
|
80
|
83
|
80
|
Fitzroy
|
96
|
90
|
98
|
82
|
88
|
74
|
78
|
79
|
Flagship
|
97
|
115
|
74
|
109
|
119
|
109
|
116
|
112
|
Fleet
|
107
|
134
|
124
|
115
|
103
|
113
|
115
|
129
|
Gairdner
|
87
|
64
|
70
|
71
|
111
|
84
|
86
|
114
|
Grimmett
|
95
|
85
|
88
|
52
|
92
|
106
|
113
|
80
|
Grout
|
109
|
121
|
112
|
148
|
123
|
129
|
128
|
104
|
Hindmarsh
|
118
|
126
|
118
|
145
|
127
|
119
|
113
|
129
|
Kaputar
|
96
|
100
|
96
|
123
|
88
|
103
|
108
|
99
|
Mackay
|
107
|
78
|
88
|
61
|
101
|
108
|
120
|
90
|
Roe
|
109
|
118
|
130
|
135
|
118
|
128
|
128
|
97
|
Skiff
|
90
|
116
|
77
|
125
|
123
|
109
|
96
|
116
|
Vlamingh
|
106
|
95
|
101
|
90
|
91
|
111
|
105
|
108
|
Site Mean (t/ha)
|
5.71
|
1.06
|
3.23
|
1.24
|
1.08
|
2.38
|
2.93
|
1.55
|
CV (%)
|
4.55
|
7.88
|
5.76
|
8.70
|
10.70
|
7.63
|
9.23
|
11.00
|
LSD (%)
|
8
|
13
|
9
|
15
|
18
|
12
|
15
|
17
|
|
NSW
|
QLD
|
||||||
|
N/E
|
N/W
|
SWQ
|
SEQ
|
||||
|
Tamworth
|
Tulloona
|
Chinchilla
|
Oakey
|
||||
Variety
|
<2.2 mm
|
>2.5 mm
|
<2.2 mm
|
>2.5 mm
|
<2.2 mm
|
>2.5 mm
|
<2.2 mm
|
>2.5 mm
|
Binalong
|
37.2
|
18.6
|
30.4
|
19.5
|
32.9
|
3.9
|
2.3
|
33.2
|
Fitzroy
|
19.1
|
42.6
|
12.1
|
52.2
|
35.5
|
10.2
|
0.5
|
57.5
|
Flagship
|
11.4
|
50.0
|
8.3
|
64.4
|
32.9
|
2.0
|
0.6
|
50.3
|
Fleet
|
4.8
|
77.1
|
8.4
|
55.3
|
4.5
|
23.3
|
0.4
|
79.2
|
Gairdner
|
41.8
|
15.5
|
9.2
|
38.2
|
49.2
|
4.6
|
1.1
|
19.8
|
Grimmett
|
18.4
|
36.8
|
7.8
|
52.3
|
25.7
|
6.0
|
1.6
|
32.0
|
Grout
|
9.6
|
58.1
|
10.0
|
48.8
|
18.9
|
4.9
|
1.3
|
16.6
|
Hannan
|
5.8
|
67.6
|
9.4
|
59.4
|
26.3
|
5.0
|
0.2
|
64.0
|
Hindmarsh
|
5.6
|
70.2
|
8.0
|
63.4
|
16.9
|
5.2
|
1.0
|
55.4
|
Kaputar
|
23.8
|
20.2
|
48.6
|
9.2
|
32.0
|
4.1
|
2.0
|
13.5
|
Mackay
|
25.1
|
27.3
|
16.1
|
22.9
|
36.3
|
1.9
|
1.5
|
36.1
|
Roe
|
4.6
|
84.1
|
3.8
|
81.6
|
2.5
|
44.3
|
0.3
|
80.5
|
Skiff
|
42.1
|
11.3
|
36.0
|
9.5
|
41.3
|
3.0
|
1.0
|
19.9
|
Vlamingh
|
7.0
|
58.1
|
4.1
|
67.6
|
12.6
|
6.9
|
0.9
|
68.9
|
2007 Agronomy Trials
Trial
|
Location
|
Entries
|
Main treatments
|
Phenology
|
Tamworth, Moree, Walgett, Hermitage, Goondiwindi, Roma, Emerald, Toowoomba.
|
|
5 planting dates
|
Nitrogen Management
|
Jondaryan, Hermitage, Yallaroi, Breeza
|
Fitzroy, Fleet, Gairdner, Grout, Hindmarsh, Mackay,
NRB03470, WI3416-1572
|
2 planting dates x 3 N levels with 1 split application
|
Planting depth
|
Jondaryan, Hermitage, Yallaroi, Breeza
|
EGA Gregory(w), Ellison(w),
Fitzroy, Fleet, Gairdner, Grimmett,
Grout, Hindmarsh,
Mackay, NRB03470,
Skiff, WI3416-1572
|
2 planting dates x 3 planting depths
|
Grazing Barley
|
Tamworth
|
Grout, Mackay, Dictator, Grimmett, Fitzroy, Skiff, Binalong, Gairdner
Urambie, Yambla, EGA Wedgetail(w), Gregory(w)
|
2 planting dates x ‘grazed’ and ‘ungrazed’
|
Collaborative trials
|
|
|
|
Seeding Rate
(Southern Barley Agronomy)
|
Gilgandra
|
Schooner, Gairdner, Baudin, Buloke, Flagship
Hindmarsh, Fitzroy, WI3416, Grout, Vlamingh
|
5 seeding rates
|
Nitrogen Rate
(Southern Barley Agronomy)
|
Gilgandra
|
Schooner, Gairdner, Baudin, Buloke, Flagship |
4 N rates
|
Canopy Management
(NGA0002)
|
Yallaroi
|
Skiff, Grout, Fitzroy, Ventura
|
3 plant pop. x 4 N treatment
|
Results
Planting Date and Nitrogen Management
Marketing of barley grain, especially for malt markets, is strongly dependent on grain quality characteristics. In some cases it may be more economically viable to target high yielding feed varieties. A series of trials were established to investigate varietal interactions with N management and planting date.
Nitrogen Management
|
Hermitage
|
Jondaryan
|
Yallaroi
|
Breeza
|
low N
|
4.85
|
2.45
|
2.26
|
3.88
|
‘Optimal' N
|
5.05
|
3.09
|
2.08
|
4.06
|
‘Optimal' N split
|
5.01
|
2.59
|
2.13
|
3.86
|
high N
|
4.93
|
3.43
|
1.84
|
3.90
|
|
Yallaroi
|
Breeza
|
Jondaryan
|
Hermitage
|
||||
Variety
|
Early
|
Main
|
Early
|
Main
|
Early
|
Main
|
Early
|
Main
|
Fitzroy
|
2.53
|
1.08
|
|
4.12
|
3.82
|
1.92
|
4.92
|
5.31
|
Fleet
|
2.98
|
2.01
|
|
3.40
|
4.13
|
2.40
|
4.63
|
4.95
|
Gairdner
|
2.00
|
0.67
|
|
4.01
|
3.54
|
1.82
|
4.19
|
4.94
|
Grout
|
2.87
|
1.92
|
|
3.48
|
3.26
|
1.74
|
4.93
|
4.10
|
Hindmarsh
|
3.27
|
2.00
|
|
3.93
|
3.26
|
2.49
|
4.92
|
5.04
|
Mackay
|
2.24
|
0.74
|
|
4.38
|
3.78
|
1.91
|
4.66
|
5.84
|
NRB03470
|
2.90
|
1.39
|
|
4.09
|
4.00
|
2.26
|
4.67
|
6.12
|
WI3416-1572
|
2.96
|
1.68
|
|
3.98
|
3.66
|
2.26
|
4.88
|
5.26
|
When considering the results from N management trials it is important to consider the influence that both yield and quality have on the final gross margin, especially when comparing feed and malt varieties. This comparison will be available at the Update.
Planting Depth
Timely planting is a key component of optimising grain yield and quality. In some seasons, moisture seeking or deep sowing is a tool that growers use to ensure timely planting. There is a significant level of variation between the coleoptile length of barley varieties, an important factor in emerging from depth (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Effect of seed source and seed treatment with triadimenol on coleoptile length of a range of barley varieties harvested from 2 sites (Donna Hocroft, QLD DPI&F).
There are a range of factors that determine the ability of a plant to emerge from deep sowing including seed size, seed source, seed treatments, soil condition and temperature can all play an important role. Some of the effects of deep sowing can be delayed emergence, poor establishment, reduced early vigour, increased disease susceptibility or reduced grain yield.
In 2007 a series of preliminary trials were sown to investigate the ability of some varieties to emerge from 3 planting depths. Despite poor plant establishment at some sites deeper plantings did not results in large yield reductions in 2/3 trials (Table 7). The compensatory capacity of barley enabled yield potential to be maintained in 2007, even at high yielding sites.
Planting Depth (cm)
|
Breeza
|
Yallaroi
|
Hermitage
|
5
|
4.08
|
1.75
|
4.96
|
10
|
4.14
|
1.77
|
4.91
|
15
|
3.88
|
1.72
|
5.01
|
The effect of grazing on grain recovery from a range of barley and wheat varieties was assessed in 2007. There was no interaction between grazing and grain recovery, even in short season varieties. Grain yield loss was greater at later plantings with no significant decline in early sown crops (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Effect of planting time and grazing on grain recovery of barley (averaged across varieties)
Contact details
Was this page helpful?
YOUR FEEDBACK