Australia’s grains industry in 2030 - a look into the future

Take home message

  • The grains industry NSW and Vic will experience important structural change towards 2030
  • Farmers are likely to increase their commercial dependence on grain storage, feed grain production and domestic market opportunities
  • The constant challenge of a warming, drying climate is likely to limit winter crop yield growth in all winter crop regions of Australia and will increase the dependence of extensive livestock production (sheep, cattle, dairy) on supplementary grain feeding.

Background

Dorothea Mackellar’s famous poem, My Country, sums up Australia as a land “of droughts and flooding rains”. Her assessment, written over a century ago, remains apt. Australia’s environmental extremes of drought, flood and bushfire continue to seriously disrupt Australian agriculture, affecting livestock and grain production, and lessening exports of agricultural commodities. Also largely unchanged is the familial basis of farm production in Australia. Yes, farms are larger; yes, there is greater mechanisation; yes, there are fewer farm families but nonetheless the majority of grain, sheep and wool production still comes from farm families who pass down through their generations; their farm business wealth, knowledge and skill in farming.

But many other things are changing to affect greatly or gradually farm production, especially grain production, in Australia. The list of factors includes:

  1. Technological change. Long gone from Dorothea Mackellar’s era is the vital role of horses in crop production. Now, powerful machinery with in-built precision and intelligence aid the sowing, spraying and harvesting of crops. Bulk-handling underpins most aspects of crop production. Communication, commercial transactions, information receival, record-keeping and various types of analysis are now based around computers and mobile phones.
  2. New crops and changing crop mixes. The wheat-sheep belt, the mainstay of Australian agriculture, has switched its land use to favour more crops, with greater crop diversification. Canola, chickpeas, lentils and lupins, once virtually unknown crops, have emerged to be important components of cropping systems in different regions. The swing into greater reliance on crop revenues is evidenced by Australia’s sheep population shrinking to now being as small as it was in 1905, 115 years ago. Yet, by contrast, in 1905 in Australia 1.5mmt of wheat was produced from 2.5mha compared to 15.9mmt being grown on 10.1mha in 2019.
  3. Altered soil management. Traditionally fields were ploughed repeatedly to combat weeds to form a friable seed bed. However, the advent of conservation agriculture (Kingwell et al., 2019) now sees crops established in single pass operations, with minimal soil disturbance, increased reliance on herbicides and increasingly with weed seed management at harvest.
  4. A changing climate. Grain production in Australia is based on rain-fed farming systems. Hence, temporal and spatial changes in rainfall and temperatures crucially affect national crop production. Investigations of long-term weather records reveal a warming trend that is affecting Australian grain production. Winter crop regions, especially in WA, additionally are affected by a downward trend in growing season rainfall, while on the eastern seaboard, there has been a change in rainfall distribution, with a trend to less rain in winter and more in summer. Extreme heat during grain filling poses a further problem in some regions where farmers observe occasional ‘heat frosts’ with grain yield and grain quality being adversely affected.
  5. An altered role of government. Traditionally, government played a major role in Australia’s grain industry. Rail systems were owned and operated by state governments. Statutory grain marketing was ubiquitous. Research and advisory services were funded and supplied principally by state governments, with the commonwealth government playing an important collaborative role in research funding. Provision of new plant varieties was almost solely the province of State government agencies, universities and the CSIRO. Governments were important employers in many rural towns. Yet now, the march of privatisation, the lesser relative economic contribution of agriculture and the emergence of other claims on the public purse (e.g. natural disaster relief, environmental protection, health and social welfare) have altered the role of government in the farm sector. Increasingly grain farmers pay fully or in large part for advice, grain marketing, research services and grain transport.

    Privatisation has not only affected government services. Even farmers’ ownership of the key services of grain handling and storage has passed into private ownership (GrainCorp, Viterra). Cooperative Bulk Handling in WA is a key exception.
  6. Emergent low-cost overseas competitors. Over the last few decades, a seismic shift in grain export prowess and rankings has occurred. In previous decades North America, Europe and Australia were main grain exporters. However, first South America (i.e. Brazil and Argentina) and then the Black Sea region (Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan) have greatly increased their grain production and grain exports. AEGIC have released reports on several of these grain exporters (e.g. Kingwell et al., 2016a, 2016b; Kingwell and White, 2018). Russia has replaced the USA as the world’s main exporter of wheat. Argentina and Brazil are main export suppliers of feed grains (soybean and corn).

All these changes, in combination, affect the current and future potential of grain production in Australia. Drawing on these changes and other key influences, the next section outlines a possible future for Australia’s grains industry at 2030. The ramifications for the grains industry in NSW and Vic are highlighted.

Australia’s grain industry towards 2030

Late last year AEGIC released a report (Kingwell 2019) that describes the likely situation and outlook of Australian grain production towards 2030. Similarly, in late 2019 Rabobank examined strategic trends in Australia’s grains industry and came to a similar conclusion that, towards 2030, feed grain demand and supply will increase in prominence in Australia, especially in eastern Australia.  Any interested readers can read the full report, but for now, the report’s following key findings are highlighted below.

Key findings

  • Australia’s population is projected to increase by between 16% and 19% by 2030. This means between 4.07 and 4.89 million additional people in Australia.
  • Little increase in the area sown to winter and summer crops in Australia has occurred since the mid-2000s and further increases are unlikely towards 2030.
  • Despite plant breeding, agronomic and technology improvements, the average rate of crop yield improvement is only 0.6 per cent per annum since the late 1980s. There is spatial variation in yield improvement trends and yield volatility remains large in eastern Australia.
  • Climate change and seasonal variation are limiting yield growth in many grain-growing regions.
  • The mix of crops grown across Australia is fairly stable with a slight increase in the relative importance of canola over the last decade. In eastern Australia, coarse grains and pulses feature more in the crop mix.
  • The pattern of meat consumption among Australians is changing, with a growing dominance of chicken and pork consumption at the expense of beef and lamb.
  • Increasingly, the main meats consumed by Australians are from grain-fed animals.
  • By 2030 in Australia:
    • Feed grain demand will increase by between 2.24mmt and 2.48mmt
    • An additional 0.64 to 0.77mmt of grain will be required for flour and malt production
    • An additional 5.65mmt of grain will be produced, increasing from current production of 49mmt in 2017/18 to 54.6mmt
    • The surplus of grain available for export is expected to be between 2.4 and 2.8mmt
    • Almost all the additional grain production in eastern Australia will need to flow to the east coast domestic market to satisfy its growth in feed and food demand
    • The main sources of additional exportable surpluses of grain will be WA and SA
    • The grain quality profile of Australia’s main export crop, wheat, is likely to alter, as WA’s and SA’s share of national wheat exports increases.

A key implication of these findings is that towards 2030, Australia’s domestic requirements for grain will become increasingly important, especially in eastern Australia where most of the population increase and greater demand for feed grains, flour, oil for human consumption and malt will occur. By contrast, most of the exportable surpluses of grain will increasingly come from the less populous states of WA and SA.

The task of finding export markets for the additional 2.4mmt to 2.8mmt of export grain available by 2030 may not be overly challenging, given the projected increase in grain imports envisaged for many of Australia’s current overseas grain customers. Nonetheless, it needs to be noted that this task of selling more Australian grain will occur against the backdrop of burgeoning exports from low-cost international competitors previously mentioned.

Assuming crop production in Australia towards 2030 remains seasonally volatile, whilst the east coast domestic demand for grain increases in relative importance, then farmers and grain users are likely to react by:

  1. Investing in more grain storage; especially whilst interest rates are low that make the cost of carrying grain affordable
  2. Focusing more on domestic market opportunities, especially in eastern Australia
  3. Focusing more on feed grain production, especially in eastern Australia and also possibly in the adjacent state of SA
  4. Opportunistically selling grain from SA and WA to end-users in eastern Australia, when low production occurs on the east coast. However, this will adversely affect SA’s and WA’s reputation as reliable exporters to overseas’ consumers
  5. Looking more closely at grain supply security when investing in export-focussed grain processing/animal protein industries – with access to export parity grain rather than exposure to import parity on the east coast.

Implications for Vic and NSW grain producers

Although the increased demand for feed grains in eastern Australia may encourage more Victorian and NSW grain producers to alter their crop mix towards more feed grain production, it is unlikely that most farmers will additionally allocate more land to cropping rather than sheep production. Despite the sizeable reduction in the national sheep population since the early 1990s, NSW and Vic farmers have maintained their investment in sheep since the early 2010s (Figure 1).

This line graph shows the sheep population in Australia, NSW and Vic since 1990Figure 1. Sheep population in Australia, NSW and Vic since 1990

In order to retain sheep numbers, either pasture areas need to be allocated for sheep production, increased areas sown to dual-purpose crops, or affordable feed grains always need to be readily available. Given the strong upward movement in sheep meat and wool prices over the last several years, on a gross margins basis, farmers are unlikely to switch land and other resources away from sheep production. Moreover, as the domestic and overseas demand for sheep meat and wool continues to expand, then retention of sheep in farming systems is increasingly likely. In addition, retaining sheep provides a means to add value to feed or downgraded grain produced on a farm. Currently, sheep enterprises form a profitable, risk-diversifying role for many farm businesses. As a result, crop production growth will be based largely on yield increases rather than crop area increases. Accordingly, crop breeding and crop agronomy will play crucial roles in ensuring gains in crop production in NSW and Vic.

In coming decades, the traditional flow of grain from Vic and NSW farms down to ports for overseas export could be a less dominant feature of their crop production, as east coast demand for grain increases in relative importance; and especially in years of low production in eastern Australia. Interstate grain flows from SA could also feature more frequently. SA’s small domestic market and more reliable climate for grain production will facilitate grain flows into NSW and Qld. These grain flows however, will affect the returns from owning infrastructure (trains, port terminals, port storage) required for grain exported overseas from NSW, Vic and SA.

As an illustration of how reduced east coast grain production can affect national grain flows, consider the impact of the 2018 drought in eastern Australia (Figure 2) on grain production, domestic consumption (Figure 3) and grain flows (Figure 4).

This maps shows the rainfall deficiencies across Australia in 2018 (up until Nov 30) with regions shaded based on level of rainfall deficiency.Figure 2. Rainfall deficiencies across Australia in 2018 (up until Nov 30)

This column graph shows the impact of the 2018/19 drought: NSW, Qld and Vic became grain importers. Source: Based on data in an appendix in ACCC (2019) Bulk grain ports monitoring report 2018–19, Canberra.Figure 3. The impact of the 2018/19 drought: NSW, Qld and Vic became grain importers.
Source: Based on data in an appendix in ACCC (2019) Bulk grain ports monitoring report 2018–19, Canberra.

This column graph shows the decline in coastal shipping flows of grain from or into each State in 2017/18 and 2018/19 Source: Based on data in an appendix in ACCC (2019)Figure 4. Coastal shipping flows of grain from or into each State in 2017/18 and 2018/19
Source: Based on data in an appendix in ACCC (2019)

In 2018/19 some regions in SA were also affected by drought. The SA grain harvest was only around 5.6 mmt, of which the main grain handler and exporter, Glencore, only exported around 2.6 mmt, indicating that around 3 mmt was either stored, used locally or exported to eastern Australia. Hence, due to SA’s small domestic market, even in low production years, SA is able to capitalise on favourable market opportunities in eastern Australia.

In years when SA or WA escape drought, yet eastern states are drought-affected, then sizeable interstate grain flows from these states are likely. Freight differentials in coming decades could be further affected by construction of the inland rail in eastern Australia, due for completion in 2025. If the inland rail is sufficiently cost-effective, then interstate grain flows from SA could be much enhanced in some years. In addition, construction of additional grain port infrastructure in SA will facilitate coastal trade. In eastern Australia, south to north flows of grain by rail, road and ship are likely to become increasingly important towards 2030 as a product of climate volatility and continuing growth in the east coast demand for grain.

The constant challenge of a warming, drying climate is likely to limit winter crop yield growth in all winter crop regions of Australia and will increase the dependence of extensive livestock production (sheep, cattle, dairy) on supplementary grain feeding. Simultaneously, further population growth, especially in the eastern states, will increase the national market demand for grains, especially feed grains. The corollary is that growth in grain production in Australia is likely to be modest and the tendency will be for a growing proportion of grain to flow to domestic markets. Exports of grain from NSW and Vic are likely to be constrained by the growth in the Australian domestic market and the constraints of climate trends on crop yields. Depending on seasonal conditions in eastern Australia, interstate flows of grain strategically will become more important and will add to the volatility of Australia’s grain exports.

In coming decades, export grain supply chains in Vic and NSW will be affected by the combination of limited growth in crop production and an increased frequency of interstate grain flows. Farmers and grain users are likely to react by increasing their investment in grain storage; especially whilst interest rates are low which makes the cost of carrying grain across seasons more affordable. If high-yielding varieties of easily stored feed grains like barley and lupins become available, these crops could feature more in farmers’ crop portfolios. Farmers are likely to enlarge their focus on feed grain production and will target, more frequently, domestic market opportunities in eastern Australia, including local feed grain value-adding opportunities.

Farmers are likely to have increasing choices over where and when they sell grain, due to the low cost of storing grain (i.e. a low interest rate environment), and the emergence of more domestic market opportunities.

Conclusion

Relatively modest population growth in Australian grain production is expected towards 2030. By contrast, Australia’s population is projected to increase by between 16 and 19 per cent by 2030. This means between 4.07 and 4.89 million additional people, mostly residing in eastern States. Despite this projected increase in population and the associated demand for feed and human consumption grains, little increase in the area sown to crops in Australia is envisaged.

The corollary is that, especially during periods of drought in the eastern States, domestic market opportunities in eastern Australia will drive grain flows and increasingly affect the viability of the ownership and operation of export grain supply chain infrastructure. Grain storage will increasingly form part of many businesses’ risk management strategies. Establishing and maintaining low-cost interstate supply chains will be an increasing complementary strategic need.

References

Kingwell, R., Elliott, P., White, P. and Carter, C. (2016a) Ukraine: An emerging challenge for Australian wheat exports, Australian Export Grains Innovation Centre, April 2016.

Kingwell, R., Carter, C., Elliott, P. and White, P. (2016b) Russia’s wheat industry: Implications for Australia, Australian Export Grains Innovation Centre, September 2016.

Kingwell, R. and White, P. (2018) Argentina’s grains industry: Implications for Australia.

Kingwell, R. (2019) Australia’s grain outlook 2030. AEGIC Industry Report.

Kingwell, R., Rice, A., Pratley, J., Mayfield, A. and van Rees, H. (2019) Farms and farmers – conservation agriculture amid a changing farm sector. In (Eds. J Pratley and J Kirkegaard) “Australian Agriculture in 2020: From Conservation to Automation” pp33-46 (Agronomy Australia and Charles Sturt University: Wagga Wagga).

Contact details

Professor Ross Kingwell
AEGIC
3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151
Ph: 08 6168 9920
Email: ross.kingwell@aegic.org.au