Soil and plant testing for profitable fertiliser use
Author: Harm van Rees (Cropfacts), Sean Mason (Agronomy Solutions), Dan Bell (Landmark), Therese McBeath, Jackie Ouzman and Rick Llewellyn (CSIRO), Craig Muir (Agrivision). Cropfacts, Agronomy Solutions; Landmark, CSIRO, Agrivision. | Date: 11 Feb 2020
Take home messages
- Based on more than 300 paddocks surveyed in the southern region, soil phosphorus (P) and soil nitrogen (N) status are highly variable across and within paddocks. In many cases, soil sampling intensity should be increased to sample multiple zones in a paddock.
- Low production zones tended to have lower soil P and higher soil N levels, and therefore, adjusting nutrient inputs according to zone could improve profitability.
- An initial paddock analysis of strips trials indicates that intensive soil sampling of production zones provided significant benefits in terms of P application. The yield response was highly variable across the paddock and was closely correlated with soil P status
- Results from N rate application strips are currently being analysed.
Precision application of variable rate fertiliser demands a knowledge of the soil available nutrient variation across a paddock and an understanding of the likely responses to applied nutrients. In addition, soil testing is shifting from surface sampling (0-10cm) to deep sampling to understand nutrient levels and constraints in the subsurface layers (GRDC farm survey, 2016). However, growers and advisers appear to be unsure of how to interpret soil test results to optimise fertiliser returns, especially with variable rate application of fertiliser. In 2016, it was estimated 15% of paddocks were regularly tested (0-10 cm) as opposed to 23% in 2014 (GRDC farm survey, 2016.).
Landmark, independent consultants and farming systems groups are partnering in this project to raise awareness of the benefits of using soil and plant testing crop to inform fertiliser decisions and responses to N and P fertiliser applications. This includes the role of soil sampling within identified production zones in a paddock to understand soil and crop variability and enable variable rate fertiliser applications. APAL laboratories are undertaking the soil and plant analysis. CSIRO are analysing yield maps, performing the statistical analysis of yields achieved on P and N rate strips, and reviewing the economic implications of implementing ‘informed’ P rate applications based on soil testing results.
Paddock trials in 2019
Over 300 paddock-based trials were established in 2019 in South Australia (SA) and Victoria (Vic) from close to 700 sampling zones. Production zones in paddocks were defined either by using historical yield maps or the grower’s long-term knowledge of the paddock. For two production zones in each paddock, a one-hectare soil sampling area was selected; the two zones were located in-line with the sowing direction. Sampling intensity for each 1ha soil sampling area was 36 topsoil samples (0-10cm) measured for available P: Colwell, Diffusive Gradient in Thin-films (DGT), phosphorus buffering index (PBI. Six deep cores (0-10, 10-30, 30-60, 60-90cm) were also collected and measured for available nitrogen (NO3 and NH4) with the samples combined for each depth to generate one soil test value. Chloride was included in the analysis to determine whether sub-soil salinity was a yield constraint.
In 150 of the 333 paddocks sampled, growers applied P rate strips across the paddock at sowing, ensuring the strips crossed the 1ha soil sampling grids. Available soil P status and likely fertiliser P response rates were calculated from Colwell and DGT tests in association with PBI. The rates of P applied were informed by the soil test result. Most strips trials included a ‘zero control’, the grower’s ‘standard rate’ of applied P, and double the ‘standard rate’ in situations predicted to be P responsive. For cases where soil P levels were high and P responses were unlikely, half the ‘standard rate’ was applied. The P rate strips received the same N as applied by the grower for the rest of the paddock. Tissue samples were collected from each fertiliser strip between growth stage (GS) 16 and 32 to check on tissue P status and possible nutrient deficiencies along with dry matter estimates.
In 2019 a number of paddocks included top-dressed N strips to generate in-crop N rate trials in paddocks where soil N variability was high. These were applied at the same time as the grower’s in-crop urea in the rest of the paddock. As with the P scenario, N trials had rates of N applied as informed by the starting soil N profile and crop yield potential, and often included a ‘zero control’, a ‘standard rate’ and double the ‘standard rate’ in responsive situations, and in non-responsive situations a half ‘standard rate’.
Harvest and statistical analysis
Yield monitor data was used to calculate the yield for each P and N fertiliser treatment. The yield from each strip within each 1ha soil sampling area was used to correlate crop yield to soil P and N status. Harvest data within each of the two soil sampling zones was analysed for statistical difference using a moving average t-test (Lawes and Bramley 2012) enabling the evaluation of nutrient treatment responses between zones and within zones. A partial gross margin analysis will be undertaken to calculate the change in income achieved from the different fertiliser rate strips.
Results and discussion
Soil nitrogen and phosphorus status 2019
A brief snapshot of the nutrient status across all project paddocks revealed high variability of both N and P between the production zones in each sampled paddock. There were many opportunities identified within each agroecological zone for the establishment of both N and P trials. Overall, the N status was generally good with about 80kg N/ha in the high production areas (Figure 1). Using the rule of thumb of 40kg N/ha required for 1t/ha grain, it was predicted this would support at least the production of a 2t/ha wheat crop without factoring in immobilisation nor mineralisation. In general, the N status was higher in the low production areas (about 100 kg N/ha) than the high production areas which suggests a N build up due to lower yields and N removal in seasons prior, possibly caused by a soil constraint.
At a paddock level, P deficiency is driven by the ability of different soils to fix or absorb P sources as estimated from the PBI. Critical Colwell P was determined by the relationship generated in Moody (2007). Critical DGT value for wheat is 64µg/L (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53-78µg/L). Quite often low production zones were associated with low extractable P, high PBI and relatively high soil N due to less utilisation of N sources and its subsequent removal (Figure 2).
In these areas, simple ‘paddock replacement fertiliser’ strategies are often unbalanced for N and P and are creating a wider gap between yield production zones and possibly declining yields. Improved gross margins from more profitable fertiliser applications are expected if different production zones are assessed for the ability of the soil to provide the crop with adequate nutrients.
Figure 1. Overall soil mineral N status across the project area (GRDC Southern region) for allocated ‘high production’ and ‘low production’ zones within paddocks before the 2019 sowing season. Error bars represent standard error across all sampling sites in each zone.
Figure 2. Overall soil P status across the project area for allocated ‘high’ and ‘low’ production zones within each paddock as assessed by Colwell P (left) and DGT (right) together with PBI for each zone. Error bars represent standard error across all sampling sites in each zone.
Victoria Mallee Trial
An example of the experimentation is presented below for a paddock sown to wheat in the Victorian Mallee where Scepter wheat was sown on 15 May 2019. The soil characteristics for both sampling areas in this paddock was slightly alkaline, clay loam to depth with starting profile N between 88-135 kg/ha allowing enough N to support the yield obtained with the additional N applied in season.
Soil P results
Soil P results for Colwell, DGT P and PBI are detailed in Table 1. In Zone 1 both soil tests predicted marginal P, while in Zone 2 the DGT P soil test predicted deficient soil P. PBI was relatively high in Zone 2.
Table 1. Mallee paddock: P test result pre-sowing 2019 (Colwell, DGT and PBI) for Zone 1 and 2
Colwell P (mg/kg)
DGT P (µg/L)
P rate trial
Four rates of P (0, 4.4. 8.8 and 17.6kg P/ha) were applied as MicroEssentials®SZTM (MESZ) at sowing with double seeder width strips across the paddock through each zone and all strips had urea at 20.7kg N/ha applied at sowing). Urea was top-dressed at 75kg/ha (34.5kg N/ha) on the whole trial area on 28 June 2019.
Figure 3. Strip yield (t/ha) for two rates of fertiliser P applied across two soil sampling areas. Solid black circles and squares indicate the yield achieved within the soil sampling areas for Zone 1 and 2.
Harvest yield map data were used to analyse the yield differences between P treatments in each of the two soil sampling areas (1ha areas located in two distinct production zones in line of sowing). Statistical analysis was based on the t-test for comparing two strips (Figure 3).
A significant difference in yield gain was confirmed only in Zone 2 for the high rate of P applied (17.6kg P/ha) (Table 2). This coincided with the lower DGT value and higher PBI area but higher Colwell P. This illustrates the importance of combining PBI with Colwell P interpretation as the critical Colwell P value from this PBI level is slightly higher (32 mg/kg) than measured. Recent GRDC work (UQ00082) has shown for this PBI level that critical Colwell P levels are near 40 mg/kg.
Table 2. Yield response to four rates of fertiliser P applied at sowing in two zones
Average yield (t/ha) within production zone
Ave yield (t/ha) entire strip
Rate (P kg/ha)
Soil nutrient status is highly variable across paddocks and these initial results indicate the benefits of sampling more than one soil type or production zone within a paddock. Preliminary results indicate that intensive soil sampling of production zones can provide significant benefit in terms of P application while results from the N rate application strips had not been analysed at the time of writing.
Burkitt LL, Moody PW, Gourley CJP and Hannah MC 2002. A simple phosphorus buffering index for Australian soils. Aust. J. Soil Research 40, 497-513
Lawes RA and Bramley RGV 2012. A simple method for the analysis of on-farm strip trials. Agronomy Journal 104: 371-377
Moody, PW 2007. Interpretation of a single-point P buffering index for adjusting critical levels of the Colwell soil P test. Australian Journal Soil Research 45: 55-62
The research undertaken as part of this project is made possible by the significant contributions of growers through both trial cooperation and the support of the GRDC, the authors thank the GRDC for their continued support. We also acknowledge the farmers who are in this project for sowing the strip trials, applying variable rate P and N, and supplying yield monitor data at harvest.
Harm van Rees
Rooney Rd, Mandurang South, Victoria
Was this page helpful?