'Magic eye' slashes costs by Bernie Reppel
GroundCover™ Issue: 44
A 24-METRE (80 ft) spray boom that uses optical sensors and infrared and near infrared technology to spray weeds, not bare soil, is saving so much herbicide that it looks like paying for its $155,000 cost in three years.
Early results from the sprayer, developed by the Brownhill family with support from the Farm Innovation Program, indicate the potential to slash the annual glyphosate bill by almost 50 per cent.
It slashes water use to the same extent — "significant when using rainwater" — and opens the way for reduced reliance on glyphosate and economic use of more expensive herbicides to control hard-to-kill weeds like bindweed.
Gordon and David Brownhill crop 3,800 hectares to durum and bread wheats, faba beans, chickpeas, barley, sorghum, sunflowers, summer legumes and irrigated maize at Spring Ridge, on the Liverpool Plains south of Tamworth, NSW.
"It's virtually all zero-till, cultivating only as a last resort, and some paddocks have been zero-till for 13 years," David Brownhill said. That means a heavy reliance on herbicide to manage fallows. As an example, wheat following sorghum has a fallow length of 15 months, 7-8 spray applications, and application rates of glysophate of between 400 ml/ha to 21/ha.
"Our annual usage of glyphosate has been 22,600 litres. Estimated glyphosate savings are nearly 11,000 litres, which equates to approximately $50,000 annually. (See table.)
|Crop||Previous crop||Follow length||Sprays||Application rate||Total glyphosate l/ha||Hectares||Total litres|
|Wheat||following||sorghum||15 months||7 to 8||400ml-2.0 l/ha||7||800||5600|
|Sorghum||following||sorghum||7 months||3 to 4||600ml- 1.6 l/ha||4.5||650||2925|
|Sorghum||following||wheat||11 months||5 to 6||600ml- 1.6 l/ha||5.2||1150||5980|
|Wheat||following||wheat||7 months||3 to 4||600ml- 1.6 l/ha||4.5||350||1575|
|Barely||following||wheat||7 months||3 to 4||600ml- 1.6 l/ha||4.5||250||1125|
Total glyphosate l/ha
|Hectars||Total litres||Targeled % saving||Total glyphosate l/ha||Targeled % saving||Chemical saved/ litres|
|Conclusion - estimates|
|Estimates of savings||11,580 Glyphosate litres||at 80% saving and|
|5,625 Glyphosate Iitres||at 30%, saving|
|Glyphosate saved||1,0951.5 litres||$ 4.50 per Iitre|
|Estimated dollars saved||$49,282 annually|
"On the Liverpool Plains now we are using 3 1/ha of glyphosate to control bindweed at a cost of $13.50/ha spraying 100 per cent of the paddock. Using glyphosate at 1.5 1/ha and Starane at 750 ml/ha and spraying only 20 per cent of the paddock would cost only $4.46, a saving of $9/ha and using a chemical that will do a better job."
Spray weeds, not the paddock
The Brownhills have long believed they needed to spray "weeds, not the paddock". Weed density and type trials by NSW Agriculture showed that, at any one time, only 17 per cent of each square metre had weeds growing on it, while the brothers were still spraying 100 per cent of the paddock.
Since commissioning the machine in August 2002, they have sprayed 4,110 hectares and used an average of 17.5 per cent of chemical per hectare for a net saving of $20,311. Water saving was 135,200 litres.
Mr Brownhill first investigated the Patchen system and technology while in the United States on a Nuffield Farming Scholarship. The team at Merrilong — "especially Scott Jameson and Gary Crobie" — designed the boom themselves. "The Patchen Weed-seeker is designed to spray only the green plants, not bare ground. It has its own internal light source, so it can work during day or night, and is easily adaptable to existing spray systems.
"Wheels are spaced along the boom's 80-foot (24 m) length, to keep its height consistently at 24-26 inches (600-625 mm). The 64 sensors are spaced 15 inches (375 mm) apart and have a field of view of 16 inches (400 mm).
"It has two controllers, the biggest sprayer Patchen had built until now had been only 40 feet (12 m). We are running two identical 40-foot (12 m) systems," Mr Brownhill said.
On the trail of chlorophyll
The Weedseeker's optical sensor measures infrared and near infrared reflectance and the presence of chlorophyll, detecting any green plant but unable to distinguish between crops and weeds. When the Weed-seeker detects a green plant, it activates a solenoid that turns the spray nozzle on and off.
Gordon and David Brownhill say they're happy with the initial results from the Weedseekers, but are still learning and confronting issues like boom design and height for maximum sensitivity so it can see weeds as small as a thumbnail. It now consistently can sense weeds half the size of a man's fist. Grass weeds are more difficult to detect.
The 64 Weedseeker units cost Merrilong Pastoral Company $120,000, boom manufacture $16,000, fit-out and commissioning $5,000 and the spray tank $14,000, totalling $155,000.
Program 6 Contact: Mr David Brownhill 0427 255 609 email email@example.com
Region North, South, West
Was this page helpful?
Sorry about that
How can we improve it?