Narrow rows aid the battle for living space
GroundCover™ Supplement Issue: 128 May - June 2017 | Author: Dr Catherien Borger, Glen Rithmuller and Mario D'Antuono
- Any reduction in row spacing will reduce the seed production of annual ryegrass in crops
- When combined with weed seed harvest, narrow row spacings can reduce annual ryegrass to levels close to zero
An 11-year trial has shown how annual ryegrass weed seedbanks can be driven down with narrow row spacings and harvest weed seed control
While narrow row spacings are generally accepted as effective in increasing a crop’s competitive advantage, this has been difficult to demonstrate in single year studies. However, in 2003 we had the opportunity to start measuring annual ryegrass seed production in a long-term crop rotation trial that had been running since 1987 at the Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia (DAFWA) Merredin Research Station.
The trial was established to look at row spacing and stubble retention versus burning in wheat, barley, canola and pulses. Herbicides were applied to the trial each year to reflect regional practice, but by 2003 there were dense stands of annual ryegrass in the trial, particularly in the wide-row unburnt plots.
By measuring ryegrass seed production over the 11 years from 2003 to 2013 we found that narrow row spacings had greater crop yield and reduced annual ryegrass seed production (Table 1).
The impact of row spacing on weed seed production compounded over time leading to a substantially higher weed seedbank in the wide-row plots compared to the narrow row spacing.
Admittedly, it is not practical for growers to go to nine-centimetre spacing, especially in high-yielding areas, where high stubble loads are difficult to manage at seeding. However, modern machinery has improved the ability of growers to achieve narrow rows, and there is now the opportunity for growers to reassess their chosen crop spacing.
Any reduction in row spacing will increase yield and reduce weed seed set.
Narrow row spacing has been shown to increase crop yield even in the absence of weeds. This is due to canopy closure at an earlier stage, increased light interception, reduced evaporation and reduced competition within the crop for resources.
|Year||Crop||Annual ryegrass seeds at harvest (seeds/m2)
SOURCE: Catherine Borger
In the long-term trial, residue burning reduced average crop yield, but also substantially reduced ryegrass seed at harvest.
The reduced yield may be at least partially explained by the loss of stored soil moisture in burnt plots. Over the 11-year trial, burning reduced the annual ryegrass seed production to levels closer to zero in the narrow row spacings.
While burning is an unlikely first choice for growers today, it is simply a form of harvest weed seed destruction. Alternative methods are now available that will destroy annual ryegrass seed more effectively than burning the entire field and without causing a reduction in yield. These include the harvest seed destructor, chaff cart or narrow windrow burning. Finding the right method of harvest weed seed management for your farming system is an important way to prevent input into the weed seedbank. Research aimed at perfecting these methods continues and is now being trialled in the eastern states (SFS00032).
Dr Catherine Borger, DAFWA,
08 9690 2220,
GRDC Project Code SFS00032
Was this page helpful?