New pre-emergent herbicides for winter crop systems that you may not have considered - What are they? What do they do? What crops can they be used in? What tips for best performance?
New pre-emergent herbicides for winter crop systems that you may not have considered - What are they? What do they do? What crops can they be used in? What tips for best performance?
Author: Mark Congreve (ICAN) | Date: 19 Jul 2023
Take home message
With increasing levels of resistance to the key post-emergent herbicides in winter crops in the northern grains region, growers are likely to be faced with an increasing need to incorporate more pre-emergent (residual) herbicides into their farming system.
In the past 3–4 years several new pre-emergent (residual) herbicides have been introduced that give winter crop growers additional tools in the toolbox. Several of these have new or unique modes of action, which is highly beneficial for herbicide mode of action rotation.
Understanding what these new herbicide options can achieve and how to utilise them safely in the crop is paramount. This paper is a brief introduction to these new products, where they fit and what key factors need to be considered to optimise performance. It is designed to be a discussion starter for growers and their agronomist to consider potential options that might not have been previously considered. As always, ensure the full product label is read, understood and followed, and do not just rely solely on the summaries below.
Where possible, growers should look to mix up their residual herbicide program as much as possible. This will extend the life of all modes of action, while also reducing environmental and microbial acclimatisation that may occur from repeated use of the same product. Consider where it may be possible to incorporate new options into your program. Doing the same thing year after year will hasten the progression towards herbicide resistance.
Crop safety. Incorporation by sowing. And why all ‘new’ herbicides are pre-emergents
In Australia, over the past 20 years, most broadacre growers have adopted a zero or minimum till farming system, primarily driven by improved soil moisture retention and crop establishment, and reduced soil compaction. The adoption of reduced tillage farming systems has also changed weed dynamics. Dominant weed species now tend to be species that are adapted to germinating with weed seeds on or close to the soil surface.
Having the weed seed located in this defined area has driven two main changes in herbicide management. Firstly, we can utilise pre-emergent herbicides with ‘low’ soil mobility, as the herbicide is applied directly to where the weed seeds are. In cultivated systems, with weed seeds buried to varying depths, a low mobility herbicide would stay closer to the soil surface and weeds germinating below the surface establish under the herbicide zone. For this reason, some ‘low mobile’ herbicides may have been overlooked in the past but may now have a fit due to the changed farming system.
The second key change is the Australian ‘invention’ of incorporation by sowing (IBS), using knife points and press wheels. This technique involves applying the pre-emergent herbicide to the soil surface and then using the planter to displace treated soil (and importantly the weed seed as well) from the planting furrow and into the inter-row. A well applied IBS application leaves very little (or no) herbicide or weed seed in the planting furrow. This has therefore allowed Australia to develop use patterns for several herbicides that would otherwise be highly toxic to the crop. Crop safety is achieved primarily via physical separation of the crop from the herbicide. As a result of the adoption of the IBS technique, we have been able to introduce many new herbicides that would otherwise not be able to be used safely in the crop. A video on incorporation by sowing can be found here.
IBS using knife points and press wheels is an excellent technique to achieve a level of physical separation of crop from the herbicide. This works especially well with herbicides of ‘low’ soil mobility, as the herbicide is moved into the interrow where the majority of the herbicide will remain.
The IBS technique can also be useful for herbicides with some mobility in the soil. These herbicides will initially be moved into the interrow, although with subsequent rainfall, they are likely to move back into the row and the crop root zone. However, by that time, the crop may have emerged and will have better herbicide tolerance once plant metabolism has commenced. There is however a risk of crop damage if the rain event occurs between sowing and when the crop is able to metabolise the herbicide, especially in a ridge and furrow system.
The IBS technique described above has become almost standard application practice when developing new pre-emergent herbicides for broadacre grain crops in Australia and has allowed several new herbicides to be commercialised that otherwise would not have been considered safe enough to use in their registered crop.
Often, growers prefer the convenience of disc planters, especially to manage planting into higher levels of trash, associated with reduced tillage farming systems. Disc seeders vary enormously in their ability to achieve adequate seed and herbicide separation. So, many labels do not support their use.
In addition to individual herbicide mobility and the use of the IBS application technique, several other factors influence crop safety for all pre-emergent herbicides:
- Applications at the higher end of the registered label rate range will increase risk
- Other herbicide residues in the soil from previous applications, or other pre-emergents in the tank mix may increase the risk of crop injury. The crop may be able to adequately detoxify one product, but the combination may cause injury
- Shallow planting depth typically places the crop seed closer to the herbicide, and hence increases the likelihood of crop injury. Conversely, sometimes very deep planting can lead to poor crop vigour which can make it more difficult for the crop to detoxify the herbicide
- Poorly set up knife point systems do not achieve adequate horizontal separation of the seed and herbicide. A problem often observed is travelling too fast for the prevailing soil type and soil moisture conditions, which results in herbicide treated soil being thrown from one planting furrow into the adjacent furrow
- Lighter soil types typically result in greater ability for herbicide to move, especially with higher rainfall events
- Soil with very low organic carbon often increases the risk of crop injury
- Heavy rainfall, especially if this occurs soon after herbicide application
- Poor crop vigour (temperature, disease, insect damage, waterlogging)
Typically, the more of these factors that are present, the greater the risk of crop injury.
What is ‘new’
Several new pre-emergent herbicides have been recently released for winter cropping systems. Below is a summary of the product, its registered use pattern and key factors to consider for safe use and optimal performance.
Table 1. Summary of Reflex® herbicide
Reflex | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | |
240 g/L fomesafen | soluble concentrate | Group 14 | ||
Use pattern | Broadleaf weed control in winter pulses | |||
Key weeds | Brassicas (including wild radish), sow thistle, prickly lettuce, fumitory, bifora, wireweed. Requires partner for grass weed control | |||
Crops | Chickpea, narrow-leaf lupin, | Vetch | Lentils | |
IBS (knife point & press wheel) | 0.5 – 1.5 L/ha | 0.5 – 1.5 L/ha | 0.5 – 1.0 L/ha | |
PSPE | 0.5 – 1.25 L/ha | 0.5 – 0.9 L/ha | ||
Key features to consider |
|
Table 2. Summary of Ultro® 900 WG herbicide
Ultro | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | |
900 g/kg carbetamide | water-dispersible granule | Group 23 | ||
Use pattern | Grass weed control in winter pulses and winter fallow | |||
Key weeds | Annual ryegrass, barley grass, brome grass | |||
Crops | Lupins | 1.1 – 2.3 kg/ha IBS | ||
Broad bean, faba bean, field pea, lentils, vetch | 1.1 – 1.7 kg/ha IBS | |||
Chickpea | 1.1 kg/ha IBS or PSPE (grass weed suppression only) | |||
Winter fallow | 1.1 – 2.3 kg/ha pre-emergence | |||
Key features to consider |
|
Table 3. Summary of Callisto® herbicide
Callisto | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | ||||
480 g/L mesotrione | suspension concentrate | Group 27 | |||||
Use pattern | Broadleaf weed control in winter cereals | ||||||
Key weeds | Brassicas (inc. wild radish), volunteer pulses and canola, fleabane, sow thistle, prickly lettuce, capeweed | ||||||
Crops | Wheat | Barley | Oats | Triticale | |||
IBS (knife point & press wheel) | 100 – 200 mL/ha | ||||||
Split application | 130 mL/ha IBS, followed by 70 mL/ha PSPE | ||||||
Key features to consider |
|
Table 4. Summary of Voraxor® herbicide
Voraxor | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | |
250 g/L saflufenacil + | suspension concentrate | Group 14 | ||
Use pattern | At residual rates, broadleaf weed knockdown + short-term residual in cereals | |||
Key weeds | Brassicas (inc. wild radish), fleabane, sow thistle, climbing buckwheat, deadnettle, capeweed. Suppression of annual ryegrass. | |||
Crops (residual rates) | Wheat, barley, oats, triticale | IBS (knife point & press wheel) | ||
Up to 7 days prior to planting | 200 mL/ha | |||
7 – 21 days prior to planting | 240 mL/ha | |||
Key features to consider |
|
Table 5. Summary of Luximax® herbicide
Luximax | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | ||
750 g/L cinmethylin | emulsifiable concentrate | Group 30 | |||
Use pattern | Key grass weeds in wheat (not durum) | ||||
Key weeds | Annual ryegrass, barley grass (suppression wild oats, brome grass) | ||||
Crops | Wheat (not durum) | IBS (knife point & press wheel) | 500 mL/ha | ||
Key features to consider |
|
Table 6. Summary of Mateno® Complete herbicide
Mateno Complete | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | |||
400 g/L aclonifen + | suspension concentrate | Groups 32, 15, 12 | ||||
Use pattern | Grass and some key broadleaf weeds in wheat (not durum) and barley | |||||
Key weeds |
| |||||
Crops | Wheat | Barley | ||||
At planting | IBS (knife point & press wheel) | 0.75 – 1 L/ha | 0.75 L/ha | |||
Disc seeders | ||||||
Early post-emergent (EPE) | 0.75 – 1 L/ha | 0.75 L/ha | ||||
Key features to consider |
|
#Consult label for more detailed directions and advice on rate and stunting
Table 7. Summary of Overwatch® herbicide
Overwatch | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | |||
400 g/L bixlozone | suspension concentrate | Group 13 | ||||
Use pattern | Grass and some broadleaf weeds in wheat, barley, canola, field peas and faba beans | |||||
Key weeds | Annual ryegrass, sowthistle, wireweed, bifora. (Suppression of barley grass, brome grass, phalaris, wild oats, prickly lettuce, wild radish, capeweed). | |||||
Crops | IBS (knife point & press wheel) | Wheat, barley, canola, field pea, faba bean | 1.25 L/ha | |||
Key features to consider |
|
Table 8. Summary of Devrinol-C® herbicide
Devrinol-C | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group |
500 g/kg napropamide | water-dispersible granule | Group 0 | |
Use pattern | Key grass weeds in canola and some broadleaf weed control | ||
Key weeds | Annual ryegrass, barnyard grass, crowsfoot grass, liverseed grass, sowthistle | ||
Crops | Pre, IBS or PSPE | Canola | 1.75 – 2.25 kg/ha |
Shallow mechanical incorporation to 2.5cm within 2-4 hours of application | |||
Key features to consider |
|
Table 9. Summary of Tenet® 500 SC herbicide
Tenet 500 SC | Active ingredient | Formulation | Herbicide Group | ||||||
500 g/L metazachlor | suspension concentrate | Group 15 | |||||||
Use pattern | Key grass weeds in canola and some broadleaf weed control | ||||||||
Key weeds |
| ||||||||
Crops | Canola | ||||||||
IBS (knife point & press wheel) | 0.75 – 1 L/ha + low rate of triazine (TT varieties only) | Refer to label for weeds controlled or suppressed at different rates and mixtures | |||||||
1.5 – 1.8 L/ha (all varieties) | |||||||||
EPE (early post-emergent)
| 0.75 L/ha + clethodim (all varieties) | Annual ryegrass, wild oats only | |||||||
Key features to consider |
| ||||||||
Soil (% clay) | 0 – 15 | 16 – 30 | 31 – 40 | >40 | |||||
Rate (L/ha) | 0.75 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 | |||||
|
Further information
GRDC (2016) Pre-emergent herbicides – Part 2 Incorporation by sowing
Contact details
Mark Congreve
ICAN Pty Ltd
Mob: 0427 209 234
Email: mark@icanrural.com.au
Date published: July 2023
® Registered trademark
GRDC Project Code: ICN1906-003SAX,
Was this page helpful?
YOUR FEEDBACK