Positive crop adaptations to climate change

Background

The Australian Grains Free Air CO2 Enrichment (AGFACE) facility has been studying the effects of elevated CO2 levels predicted for the year 2050 on crop production for nine seasons. It is a joint program of research between the Victorian government and the University of Melbourne. 

Atmospheric CO2 levels have risen from 280ppm in 1870 to 405 ppm in 2015. This concentration will increase to 550ppm by 2050. As CO2 is the fundamental molecule used by plants in photosynthesis, increasing concentrations will impact not only photosynthesis efficiency but also water and nitrogen (N) processes in crops. These changes affect growth, yield, pests, water use, tolerance to heat and all aspects of production. Adaptation to an increase in CO2 includes management changes and trait selection to take advantage of the positives and reduce the impacts of the negatives. Understanding these positive and negative impacts to crop production will prepare farmers and the agricultural industry for the future.

Methodology

In AGFACE, CO2 levels are increased around crops grown under field conditions in open octagonal rings, which consist of horizontal metal pipes that emit CO2 (Figure 1) into the wind. The wind then blows the CO2 across the crops within. These horizontal rings are raised on supports to sit just above the crop canopy during crop growth. A central sensor measures the concentration and a computer maintains the central CO2 concentration at 550ppm, taking into account wind speed and direction. Different segments of the rings are turned on and off as wind direction changes, allowing the CO2 emitted to be blown across the ring uniformly. The experiments are fully randomised and blocked such that half the ‘rings’ have elevated CO2 and half are at current ambient concentrations.

Figure 1: AGFACE ring – TraitFACE.

Figure 1: AGFACE ring – TraitFACE.

As in many research projects, small plots are sown with different crops under various imposed treatments. In the course of nine years, different treatments have been tested including times of sowing, different irrigation levels, different varieties (approximately 20) of wheat, as well as field pea, lentils and canola. Currently we are testing nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) responsiveness and N management treatments.

There are several sub-facilities in the AGFACE including the TraitFACE, NFACE, and SoilFACE as well as glasshouses and chambers used for more controlled studies for physiology and pest and disease assessment. In the TraitFACE, the response of different varieties carrying particular traits is tested. Traits that have been tested include: tillering, transpiration use efficiency, carbohydrate storage, rooting, nitrogen use efficiency and grain protein quality. In the NFACE, different modes and amounts of nitrogen fertiliser inputs are studied to understand whether timing and type of N fertilisers can reduce the negative impact of elevated CO2 to grain protein levels. In the SoilFACE, intact soils cores are brought from different areas of the state to study soil type interactions under elevated CO2. A soil from the high rainfall zone (HRZ) near Hamilton, one from Horsham and another from the arid Mallee represent three very distinct soils.

Figure 2: AGFACE ring – SoilFACE.

Figure 2: AGFACE ring – SoilFACE.

Results and discussion

Yields and water use

Elevated CO2 (eCO2), by itself, tends to increase yields in many crops, including wheat, peas, lentils and others. Results from AGFACE have shown on average an increase of about 25 per cent in wheat yields and a similar amount for field peas. The mean, however, varies greatly depending on season and variety. A range of 0 to over 70 per cent increase has been measured. Figure 3 shows the yields (g/m2) plotted as ambient CO2 (aCO2) versus eCO2. The deviation of the regression from the 1:1 line shows the mean increase of 25 per cent for the 2007-09 wheat yields but other years are similar.

Figure 3: Yield stimulation due to eCO2. Mean increase was 25 per cent for the years 2007-09.

Figure 3: Yield simulation due to eCO2. Mean increase was 26% for the years 2007-09.

Another feature of eCO2 is increased water use efficiency (WUE). In AGFACE, WUE has been shown to increase by about 25 per cent compared to current ambient conditions. This occurs because the plant does not have to keep the stomatal pores on its leaves open as long to capture CO2 since the concentration is greater. Thus, there is less loss of water from the leaves through transpiration. Since crops are larger under eCO2 they may use more water to support their growth. Thus, the actual water use of crops may be similar to current crop production. Results from AGFACE show a net reduction in water use of about six per cent from 2007-09.

Testing traits

Elevated CO2 leads to increased growth, and hence biomass. This is expressed in wheat by increasing height, overall mass of plant parts and more tillers. More tillers lead to more spikes and is a principal mechanism for yield increases. Thus, selection of varieties with more tillering potential could be one mechanism for taking advantage of the ‘CO2 fertilisation effect’. One study compared freely and restricted traits in cultivars Silverstar and H45 (Tausz-Posch et al., 2015). Both were stimulated to similar amounts by elevated CO2 for yield but the freely tillering Sliverstar yield was caused by more fertile tillers while the restricted tillering H45 put on more tillering and had larger kernels and more kernels per spike. Thus, the mechanisms for achieving yields differ, depending on traits. This type of knowledge needs to be incorporated into breeding programs so that the most advantage can be made of elevated CO2.

Another trait tested was transpiration use efficiency (TUE) comparing the Hartog and Drysdale cultivars (Tausz-Posch et al., 2012). Given that plants under elevated CO2 are expected to be more water use efficient, one of the hypothesis was that the advantage conferred from the TUE trait in Drysdale would be less effective under future elevated CO2 concentrations. However, the opposite was found. Drysdale yielded 19 per cent more under elevated CO2 but only 2 per cent more under current ambient concentrations compared to Hartog, which is a parent of Drysdale but does not have the TUE trait. Thus, continued research into more transpiration efficient cultivars should remain fruitful.

Other traits such as rooting and nitrogen use efficiency are currently be tested in AGFACE.

Grain quality

Elevated CO2 decreases the amount of N in plant leaves, which in C3 type plants (most efficient at photosynthesis in cool, wet climates) like wheat and legumes, leads to reductions in grain protein. The decrease in wheat measured in AGFACE ranged from one to 15 per cent, depending on environment and variety. Increasing yields may drive this to some extent, causing an ‘N dilution’ effect but elevated CO2 also causes physiological changes in the plant that appears to be related to certain genes being expressed differently (Buchner et al. 2015). The mean protein reduction in wheat across all seasons from AGFACE data is six per cent. Although this doesn’t seem like much, a pilot analysis using receival site data from farms across Victoria has shown this resulted in 35 per cent of all grain downgraded in quality to the next lowest class in the year this was tested.

Another consequence of reduced wheat grain protein is changes in bread quality (Panozzo et al., 2014). The changes in protein amount and possibly composition lead to changes in elasticity and other factors important in bread making. Not all varieties are affected equally however, but some show large changes in volume, shape and other important characteristics (Figure 4).


Figure 4: Reduced loaf volume due to elevated CO2.

Figure 4: Reduced loaf volume due to elevated CO2.

Besides changes in grain protein, there are analogous reductions in grain micronutrients, particularly iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn), both important in human nutrition (Myers et al., 2014). This reduction in micronutrients has been referred to as ‘hidden hunger’ and in AGFACE wheat grain Zn and Fe concentrations reduced by, on average, five and 10 per cent respectively. It is currently unclear why these reductions occur but this is being researched. Although reduction in micronutrients may not affect people with access to abundant food, increasing population may lead to millions of people, principally in Africa, suffering from Zn deficiency (Myers et al., 2015).

Legumes do not tend to show reductions in grain protein because they have a separate mechanism for acquiring N from soil microbes. In AGFACE, field peas showed a slight reduction in grain protein, but in production terms the effect was small (Bourgault et al., in preparation).

Pests

It is generally poorly understood what the effect of elevated CO2 is on different pests and disease. Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV) is a pathogen in wheat which causes serious damage and decreased yield and is spread by an aphid vector. The results of a study in AGFACE have shown that the damage caused by the virus will increase under elevated CO2 (Trebicki et al., 2015). BYDV titre in elevated CO2 wheat leaves increased by about 37 per cent. Although the reasons for this increase in virus amount in the plants are currently unknown, it has been observed that aphids tend to feed more on plants grown under elevated CO2, increasing the chances of spreading the virus from infected aphids. The reason for this is that since plants have less leaf tissue N, aphids need to feed more, which they do my inserting their stylus into leaves more often. Adaptation may require breeding for resistant lines but more research into understanding the mechanisms of virus increases is required.

Belowground processes

Soil type appears important in determining crop response to elevated CO2. The soil chemistry as well as available N and root dynamics are all important in determining response. For example, larger plants will require more N to maximize the yield advantage from CO2, either through rotation with legumes or addition of more chemical fertilisers. In AGFACE, an increase of N uptake of 21 per cent has been observed for wheat (Figure 5). Root biomass has also been shown to increase and studies are on-going to look at changes in root distribution and access to water and nutrients under elevated CO2.

Figure 5. N uptake increase of 21 per cent due to elevated CO2 (eCO2) versus ambient CO2 (aCO2).

Figure 5: N uptake increase of 21 per cent due to elevated CO2 (eCO2) versus ambient CO2 (aCO2).

Heat shocks

In 2009, there was an extended heat wave near anthesis across the south eastern wheat belt that saw temperatures over 32° C for about eight days. In that year, heat wave effects were ameliorated under elevated CO2 as shown by reductions of 31 and 54 per cent in screenings and 10 and 12 per cent larger kernels (for Horsham and Walpeup sites, respectively) compared to ambient. Greatest yield stimulations occurred in the elevated CO2 late sowing treatments and heat stressed treatments, for those treatments supplied with more water. It appears that under elevated CO2, if there is sufficient water near anthesis, plants can maintain yields by maintaining kernel size.

Computer modelling

Computer simulation is an important tool to synthesize results from AGFACE with other information, particularly information that is not easily obtained from field studies, such as landscape changes in temperature and rainfall. Integration with economic data will also be valuable to understand farm level impacts. Integrating these data can provide a predictive tool to understand a more complete picture of the impacts of changing climate on crop production and what can be done to adapt. Research is currently on-going to synthesise the years of data from AGFACE to provide a glimpse into future impacts of elevated CO2 under a range of possible environments. This will provide information for development of adaptation strategies for trait selection and management practices (such as sowing time and N management) to take the most advantage of elevated CO2.

Conclusion

Carbon dioxide is fundamental to plant growth, yield, grain quality, response to heat, pests and diseases. Research in AGFACE, a low rainfall environment, has shown that elevated CO2:
  • Increases growth and yields in wheat, peas and other crops by on average 25 per cent but with a large range from 0 to over 70 per cent
  • Decreases protein content in wheat grain by up to 15 per cent
  • Increases water use efficiency by on average 25 per cent, but water use may only reduce slightly
  • Decrease bread loaf volume and other quality factors
  • Increases the incident of barley yellow dwarf virus
  • May reduce the impacts of heat waves near anthesis.
Adaptation strategies need to consider elevated CO2 impacts on crops to accentuate the positive effects (such as traits to enhance yields) and to overcome the negative aspects (such as reversing reductions in grain protein). This will allow continued improvement in yields despite changes in climate.

Useful resources

Australian Grains Free Air CO2 Enrichment website

Buchner P, Tausz M, Ford R, Leo A, Fitzgerald GJ, Hawkesford MJ, Tausz-Posch S. (2015) Expression patterns of C- and N-metabolism related genes in wheat are changed during senescence under elevated CO2 in dry-land agriculture. Plant Science 236:239-249.

Myers S, Zanobetti A, Kloog I, Dietterich L, Sartor K, Hasegawa T, Raboy V, Nelson R, Leakey A, Ottman MJ, Tausz M, Fitzgerald G, Seneweera S, Schwartz J. (2014)  Rising CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature, 510:139-143.

Myers S, Wessells KR, Kloogg I, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J (2015) Effect of increased concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide on the global threat of zinc deficiency: a modelling study. The Lancet Global Health 3(10): e639-e645.

Panozzo JF, Walker CK, Partington DL, Neumann NC, Tausz M and Fitzgerald GJ. (2014) Elevated carbon dioxide changes grain protein concentration and composition and compromises baking quality.  A FACE study. J Cereal Science 60:461-470.

Tausz-Posch S, Dempsey RW, Seneweera S, Norton RM, Fitzgerald G, Tausz M. (2015) Does a freely tillering wheat cultivar benefit more from elevated CO2 than a restricted tillering cultivar in a Mediterranean-type cropping system?  European Journal of Agronomy, 64:21-28. 

Tausz-Posch S, Seneweera S, Norton R, Fitzgerald G, Tausz M (2012).  Can a wheat cultivar with high transpiration efficiency maintain its yield advantage over a near-isogenic cultivar under elevated CO2?  Field Crops Research 133:160–166.

Acknowledgement

Funding for this work was provided through the GRDC Project DAV00137 and their support gratefully acknowledged.

Contact details 

Glenn Fitzgerald

Agriculture Research Division
Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources
03 5362 2111 
glenn.fitzgerald@ecodev.vic.gov.au

GRDC Project Code: DAV00137,