Predicted climate change impacts on NSW farming systems - Dubbo

Author: | Date: 26 Feb 2019

Take home message

An increasing body of scientific evidence regarding the impact of human activity on the earth’s climate has shifted the debate from “Is climate change real?” to “What can we do about it?”  Adapting current management activities must include considerations of both climate variability and change.  Advisers have a vital role in helping to develop information-rich farming systems that will improve responses to current climate variability and that can enhance adaptation to climate changes.

Historical changes in climate?

Globally averaged air temperature has warmed by over 1oC since records began in 1850, and each of the last four decades has been warmer than the previous one (IPCC 2018).  This warming is driven by increasing concentrations of all the major long-lived greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, with carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations rising above 400ppm and the CO2 equivalent (CO2-e) of all gases reaching 500ppm for the first time in at least 800,000 years (Foster et al., 2017).

In Australia, the pattern of warming (average temperature) has been largely similar to that experienced globally, with warming of just over 1oC since 1910 (BoM & CSIRO 2018).  Examining the shift in the distributions of monthly day and night-time temperature shows that very high monthly maximum temperatures that occurred around 2% of the time in the past (1951–1980) now occur around 12% of the time (2003–2017) (BoM & CSIRO 2018). Very warm monthly minimum, or night-time, temperatures have shown a similar change from 2% of the time in the past (1951–1980) to 12% more recently. This shift in the distributions towards hotter temperatures and more extreme high temperature conditions has occurred across all seasons, with the largest change being in spring (BoM & CSIRO 2018).

In the Dubbo region over the period 1950 to 2018 (the length of the temperature record), warming has occurred in both minimum and maximum temperatures, with mean temperatures now approximately 1.2oC warmer than in 1950. For the period 1950 to 1985 a maximum daily temperature of 25oC occurred, on average, 18% of the year i.e. 66 times. More recently (1986 to 2018), this temperature now occurs on average 31% of the time i.e. 113 times.  Similarly, mean minimum temperatures have warmed with the frequency of a minimum temperature of 19oC increasing from 11 to 29 times each year on average (Figure 1).

This is a set of two graphs showing probability distributions of mean daily maximum temperature (left) and mean daily minimum temperatures (right) for Dubbo for two periods, 1960 to 1985 and 1986 to 2018. In the Dubbo region over the period 1950 to 2018 (the length of the temperature record), warming has occurred in both minimum and maximum temperatures, with mean temperatures now approximately 1.2oC warmer than in 1950. For the period 1950 to 1985 a maximum daily temperature of 25oC occurred, on average, 18% of the year i.e. 66 times. More recently (1986 to 2018), this temperature now occurs on average 31% of the time i.e. 113 times.  Similarly, mean minimum temperatures have warmed with the frequency of a minimum temperature of 19oC increasing from 11 to 29 times each year on average.

Figure 1. Probability distributions of mean daily maximum temperature (left) and mean daily minimum temperatures (right) for Dubbo for two periods, 1960 to 1985 and 1986 to 2018

The Dubbo rainfall record exhibits a declining trend, with declines during the December to February period most pronounced.  Mean dry spell lengths have also increased, with the average time between rainfall events now four days longer during June to August (i.e. an average dry spell length of 8 days for 2018: Figure 2). Despite declines in annual rainfall totals, the number of heavy rainfall events (i.e. greater than the 90th percentile) across the whole year has increased, most notably during the September to November period. The maximum number of consecutive dry days has increased across the whole year (i.e. from 33 to 38 days) with March to May and September to November periods increasing by 2 and 5 days respectively (i.e. now 30 and 23 days respectively).

This is a set of new graphs showing the mean annual dry spell length (left) and seasonal dry spell length for December to January (DJF), March to May (MAM), June to August (JJA) and September to November (SON). Dry spell lengths are expressed in days. The Dubbo rainfall record exhibits a declining trend, with declines during the December to February period most pronounced.  Mean dry spell lengths have also increased, with the average time between rainfall events now four days longer during June to August (i.e. an average dry spell length of 8 days for 2018.

Figure 2. Mean annual dry spell length (left) and seasonal dry spell length for December to January (DJF), March to May (MAM), June to August (JJA) and September to November (SON). Dry spell lengths are expressed in days

The current acceleration of global warming is expected to continue based on future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trajectories. Previous studies have examined how the rates of record-breaking have changed in the US (Anderson and Kostinski, 2011), the UK (Kendon, 2014), and Australia (Lewis & King, 2015). These studies have found increased rates of hot temperature records and decreased record setting for cold temperatures in recent decades (King et al., 2015; King, 2017). Lewis and King (2015) found that from 2000 to 2014 there were 12 times as many hot record‐breaking temperatures as cold records in Australia and attributed this to anthropogenic climate change. Across the world, there were about five times more record‐breaking monthly temperatures than would be expected without a long‐term warming trend (Coumou et al., 2013) over the early 21st century.

Climate change has been found to not only increase the likelihood of breaking high temperature records (e.g. Lewis and Karoly, 2013), but record‐breaking hot summers and years over previous decades are also attributable to anthropogenic climate change (King et al., 2016). More recent research by Mann et al. (2018) has shown that the synoptic features (large scale weather systems) responsible for prolonged heatwaves are on average 50% more prevalent under a business-as-usual GHG emissions trajectory.

In addition to record breaking temperatures, changes in rainfall patterns, sea levels, rates of glacial retreat and biological responses have also been detected consistent with expected climate change projections.  This mounting evidence has led to scientific consensus that:

  • Emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols due to human activities continue to alter the atmosphere in ways that affect the climate system and these changes and resultant trends will continue for the foreseeable future
  • There is at least 95% confidence that humans are the main cause of global warming since 1950, and most likely responsible for 100% of that temperature rise (IPCC, 2013) with a less than 1 in 100 000 chance that human activities are not responsible for the observed increase in global temperatures (Kokic et al., 2014)
  • These changes are already likely to have negatively impacted on Australian agriculture, acting as a major drag on yield growth (Huong et al., 2018) with similar impacts on yield growth globally for the major crops (Porter et al., 2014).

A major issue in understanding historical and future climate change is how much are the various human-induced climate forcings (greenhouse gas emissions, stratospheric ozone depletion, Asian aerosols and landcover change) interact with components of natural variability (Watkins 2005, McKeon 2006). Thus, it is important for successful climate adaptation that agricultural decision-makers keep informed of the evolving climate science and updated climate change scenarios.  As scientific understanding improves and there is more confidence in emission scenarios, current and future uncertainties can be rapidly assessed in terms of decision making.

What is expected to happen in the future?

In response to the continued growth in atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations, scientists estimate that global average temperatures could increase by up to 4.8oC by the end of the present century, dependent on global population growth, technological advancement and economic growth (IPCC, 2013). To put this in context, the difference between our historical temperatures and those of the last ice age was only about 5oC. So even though 4.8oC does not sound like much it signals a huge change in how the climate-ocean-land systems of the earth function and hence how agriculture will operate.

In Australia, national projections suggest up to 1.3oC of additional warming could be experienced by 2030 and up to 5.1oC of warming could be experienced by 2090, with the greatest warming being in inland Australia and the lesser warming along the southern coast and Tasmania (CSIRO, 2015). Global studies indicate that a rule of thumb is that global potential crop production drops by 6% per degree warming (Porter et al., 2014).

Whilst changes in rainfall are more uncertain, projections suggest drier conditions in the southern half of Australia, particularly in the south-west and during the cool season months of May to October with as much as 20% less by 2030 and up to 50% less rainfall by 2090 (CSIRO, 2015).

At a regional scale, projected change in climate for the Central West and Orana region (Dubbo represents a central town in this study region) are summarised in Table 1.  In addition to warmer temperatures and no change (2030) to slight increases in mean annual rainfall (2070), evaporation rates are likely to increase

Table 1. Projected changes in temperature and rainfall for Central West and Orana region (Dubbo represents a central town in this study region).  Present average temperatures and rainfall are calculated for the period 1986 to 2005.  The data contained in this table represents information compiled from the Queensland Department of Environment and Science, SILO database and New South Wales Department of Environment and Heritage.

Variable

Season

Historical Mean (1986 to 2005)

2030

2070

Mean Temperature and temperature change

(oC)

Annual

17.1oC

0.7

(0.5 to 0.9)

2.1

(1.7 to 2.6)

Summer

24.4oC

0.9

(0.5 to 1.6)

2.4

(1.8 to 3.1)

Autumn

17.6oC

0.6

(0.4 to 0.9)

2.0

(1.4 to 2.6)

Winter

9.9oC

0.4

(0.2 to 0.6)

1.7

(1.1 to 2.0)

Spring

16.7oC

0.8

(0.6 to 1.2)

2.3

(1.9 to 2.9)

Mean Rainfall (mm) and rainfall change

(% change)

Annual

604mm

0

(-12 to +11)

+7

(-10 to +22)

Summer

160mm

-1

(-15 to +17)

+13

(-10 to +26)

Autumn

141mm

+14

(-11 to +42)

+13

(-9 to +45)

Winter

139mm

-4

(-12 to +3)

+5

(-25 to +34)

Spring

162mm

-8

(-25 to +11)

-6

(-25 to +17)

The impacts of climate change on wheat production for the Dubbo region have been simulated using the Agricultural Production Simulator (APSIM).  The simulations are based on a continuous wheat rotation with a Hartog wheat variety, grown on a sandy clay loam soil.  The simulations were run using daily climate data for the period 1990 to 2018, with future scenarios for 2030 and 2070 produced by scaling daily temperature and rainfall from the historical baseline period by the mean annual values found in Table 1.

If the 1990 to 2018 climate were to change, with a mean increase in temperature of 0.7oC with no change in annual rainfall (i.e. the mean 2030 projection) small improvements (approximately 55 kg per hectare) might be possible for 5th, 25th and 50th percentile yields (Figure 3).  The 75th percentile yields could also improve by as much as 185 kg per hectare, however the 95th percentile yields could decline by as much as 470 kg per hectare (Figure 3).

This is a boxplot graph showing heat yield for Dubbo for the period 1990 to 2018 (baseline), for a 28 year period centred on 2030 and 2070. If the 1990 to 2018 climate were to change, with a mean increase in temperature of 0.7oC with no change in annual rainfall (i.e. the mean 2030 projection) small improvements (approximately 55 kg per hectare) might be possible for 5th, 25th and 50th percentile yields (Figure 3).  The 75th percentile yields could also improve by as much as 185 kg per hectare, however the 95th percentile yields could decline by as much as 470 kg per hectare.

Figure 3. Boxplots of wheat yield for Dubbo for the period 1990 to 2018 (baseline), for a 28 year period centred on 2030 and 2070. Simulations were undertaken using APSIM based on a continuous wheat rotation with variety Hartog on a sandy clay loam soil. Yields are expressed in kilograms per hectare. The horizontal line indicates the average yield, the top and bottom of the ‘box’ indicates the 25th and 75th percentiles (i.e. the yields exceeded in and of years ) and the tops and bottoms of the ‘whiskers indicate the 95th percentile and bottom 5th percentile values). Climate scenarios for the 2030 and 2070 simulations are based on the mean annual projections of change in temperature and rainfall found in Table 1.

Looking at the 2070 scenarios, if temperatures were to increase by 2.1oC and annual rainfall were to increase by 7%, significant changes in yields are likely.  Increases in 75th and 95th percentile yields are possible (i.e. 420 kg per hectare and 435 kg per hectare respectively).  This is coupled with possible large declines in both 25th and 5th percentile yields (i.e. declines of 380 kg per hectare and 1020kg per hectare respectively).  With little change in 50th percentile yields from those simulated for the baseline period, production variability could increase by more than 35% by 2070 (i.e. the difference between high yields and low yields is likely to increase significantly).

This simple example highlights the sensitivity of wheat production at Dubbo to temperature increases and modest changes in annual rainfall, but does not take into consideration the compounding effects such as changes in runoff (Figure 4). This simulation exercise does begin to make a case for adaptation at a range of spatial scales including farm-level and regional scales as well as changes to strategic planning and polices at the state and national level.

This is a map showing the mid-range assessment of changes in average runoff per degree global temperature increase (IPCC 2014). Run-off integrates the effects of changes in temperature, rainfall and evaporation. For example, where the map shows a 25% reduction in runoff per degree and global temperatures rose by 2oC then runoff is likely to halve (i.e. 2 times 25%) with major implications for water resource management including for irrigated agriculture.

Figure 4. Mid-range assessment of changes in average runoff per degree global temperature increase (IPCC 2014). Run-off integrates the effects of changes in temperature, rainfall and evaporation. For example, where the map shows a 25% reduction in runoff per degree and global temperatures rose by 2oC then runoff is likely to halve (i.e. 2 times 25%) with major implications for water resource management including for irrigated agriculture.

Adapting to projected climate changes

Climate change is likely to pose a significant challenge for Australian agriculture. Of greatest concern are likely to be changes in water availability, and the change in frequency of climatic extremes (e.g. heatwaves, drought and floods).

Many of the actions required for adapting to climate change are extensions of those currently used for managing climate variability.  For this reason, efforts to improve current levels of adaptation to climate variability will have positive benefits in addressing likely climate change impacts.

Examples of likely farm level adaptation options include:

  • Enhancing the current implementation of zero tillage and other minimum disturbance techniques, retaining crop residues, extending fallows, changing row spacing, changing planting density, staggering planting times, traffic and erosion controls
  • Alter planting decisions to be more opportunistic – more effectively considering environmental condition (e.g. soil moisture), climate (e.g. seasonal climate forecasting) and market conditions
  • Expand routine record keeping of weather, production, degradation, pest and diseases, weed invasion
  • Incorporating seasonal climate forecasts and climate change into farm enterprise plans
  • Improve efficiency of water distribution systems (to reduce leakage and evaporation), irrigation practices and moisture monitoring
  • Learning from farmers in currently more marginal areas
  • Selection of varieties with appropriate thermal time and vernalisation requirements, heat shock resistance, drought tolerance, high protein levels, resistance to new pests and diseases and perhaps that set flowers in hot/windy conditions
  • Enhance current consideration of decision support tools/training to access/interpret climate data and analyse alternative management options (e.g. APSIM, EverCrop).

There are also longer-term decisions at a family farm level - to sell up, to buy more land, where to invest. These are especially pertinent for farmers in low rainfall regions and it will increasingly be more difficult to find no-regret decisions if climate change progresses as anticipated (Hayman 2005). These decisions, along with industry infrastructure (silos etc.) and industry support (drought policy) are hard decisions requiring full understanding of the likely future risks (Hayman 2005).

The value of adaptation

There is a growing international body of research examining the benefits of adaptation to climate variability and change, showing a number of adaptation options are available to reduce the possible impacts of climate change.

In Australia a number of studies have examined the economic benefits of adaptation in the wheat industry at both national and regional scales under a range of likely future climate conditions.  Hochman et al. (2017) highlighted that the adoption of new technology and management systems has held actual yields fairly steady: without these advances, water-limited yield would have dropped by 27%. It was estimated that rainfall declines should have accounted for about three-quarters of the fall in simulated yield potential, whilst observed warming should have accounted for about a quarter of fall in yield potential.

Continued adaptation to climate change has been estimated to add an additional AU$500M per annum to Australia’s annual income from wheat exports (Howden and Crimp 2011) via the introduction of improved water-use efficiency options and may mitigate potential yield losses by up to 18% through broader scale adaptation (Ghaharamni et al., 2015).

The results suggest a number of adaptation options exist to manage increased future downside risk however the effectiveness of adaptation is driven by the extent of future change. Under conditions of large climate change, tactical adaptation will only have limited effectiveness and more extensive adaptation options, often defined as transformation adaptation, may be required.

Advisers have a key role to play in changing the nature of the climate change dialogue. In the space of about five years many grain growers and their advisers have moved from asking "What is climate change?" or "Is it real?" to "How do we manage for climate change?" and "What will the impact be on the grains industry?"

Advisers have a vital role to play in this dialogue, not only in assisting grain growers in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from on-farm activities, but also in developing information systems that growers can tap into in order to build farming systems that can cope with current climate variability and can adjust to ongoing climate changes.

References

Anderson A and Kostinski A (2011) Evolution and distribution of record‐breaking high and low monthly mean temperatures. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 50(9), 1859–1871. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC‐D‐10‐05025.1

BoM and CSIRO (2018) State of the Climate 2018. ISBN: 978-1-925315-97-

Coumou D, Robinson A and Rahmstorf S (2013) Global increase in record‐breaking monthly‐mean temperatures. Climatic Change, 118(3–4), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584‐012‐0668‐1

CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology (2015). Climate Change in Australia Information for Australia’s Natural Resource Management Regions: Technical Report, CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, Australia.

Foster GL, Royer DL & Lunt DJ (2017)  Future climate forcing potentially without precedent in the last 420 million years. Nature Communications. 8:14845. https://doi:10.1038/ncomms14845

Ghahramani, A., Kokic, P.N., Moore, A.D., Zheng, B., Chapman, S.C., Hoden, S.M., and Crimp, S.J. (2015). The value of adapting to climate change in Australian wheat farm systems: farm to cross-regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 211, 112-125.

Hayman, P. (2005). Linking Climate change to Farming Systems.  Research Update for Advisers – Southern Region (http://www.grdc.com.au/growers/res_upd/south/_content.htm)

Hochman, Z, Gobbett, D.L. and Horan, H (2017). 'Climate trends account for stalled wheat yields in Australia since 1990', Global Change Biology, vol. 23, pp. 2071–81. https// doi: 10.1111/gcb.13604.

Howden S.M., Crimp S. (2011). Regional impacts: Australia. In ‘Crop 40 adaptation to climate change’. (Eds SS Yadav, RJ Redden, JL Hatfield, H Lotze-Campen, AE Hall) pp. 143–155. (Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK)

Howden, S.M., Meinke, H., Power B., and McKeon. G.M. (2003). Risk management of wheat in a non-stationary climate: frost in Central Queensland. Post, D.A. (ed.) Integrative modelling of biophysical, social and economic systems for resource management solutions. Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, July 2003, Townsville, pp 17-22.

Huong D, Donoghoe M, Hughes N and Goesch T (2018) A micro-simulation model of irrigation farms in the southern Murray-Darling basin, ABARES working paper, Canberra, November

IPCC (2018) Summary for Policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, T. Waterfield (eds.)]. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp

IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324

Kendon M (2014) Has there been a recent increase in UK weather records? Weather, 69(12), 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.2439

King, AD (2017) Attributing changing rates of temperature record breaking to anthropogenic influences. Earth’s Future.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000611

King AD, Black MT, Min SK, Fischer EM, Mitchell DM, Harrington LJ and Perkins‐Kirkpatrick SE (2016) Emergence of heat extremes attributable to anthropogenic influences. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(7), 3438–3443. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067448

King AD, Donat MG, Fischer EM, Hawkins E, Alexander LV, Karoly DJ and Perkins SE (2015) The timing of anthropogenic emergence in simulated climate extremes. Environmental Research Letters, 10(9), 94015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748‐9326/10/9/094015

Kokic P, Crimp S and Howden M (2014) A probabilistic analysis of human influence on recent record global mean temperature changes. Climate Risk Management, 3 1-12

Lewis, SC and Karoly, DJ (2013) Anthropogenic contributions to Australia's record summer temperatures of 2013. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(14), 3705–3709. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50673

Lewis, S.C., and King, A.D. (2015). Dramatically increased rate of observed hot record breaking in recent Australian temperatures. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(18), 7776–7784. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065793.

Mann ME, Rahmstorf S, Steinman BA, Tingley M and Miller SK (2016) The likelihood of recent record warmth. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 19831. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19831

Mann ME, Rhamstorf S, Kornhuber K, Steinman BA, Miller SK, Petri S and Coumou D (2018) Projected changes in persistent extreme summer weather events: The role of quasi-resonant amplification. Science Advances, 4(10), eaat3272. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat3272

McKeon GM (2006) ‘Living in a variable climate’, article prepared for the 2006 Australia State of the Environment Committee, Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra

Porter JR, Xie L, Challinor AJ, Cochrane K, Howden SM, Iqbal MM, Lobell DB and Travasso MI (2014) Food security and food production systems. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L.White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 485-533

Watkins AB (2005) ‘The Australian drought of 2005’, Bulletin of the World Meteorological Organisation 54:156-162

Acknowledgements

The authors would also like to acknowledge that this research was made possible via financial support from the New South Wales Department of Environment and Heritage. We would like to acknowledge the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) for provision of its Australian Climate Observations Reference Network – Surface Air Temperature (ACORN-SAT) data and the Science Division of the Queensland Department of Environment and Science (DES) for provision of it SILO climate projections for analysis.

Contact details

Dr. Steve Crimp
Climate Change Institute
Australian National University
Fenner School of Environment and Society
Building 141, Linnaeus Way, Action, ACT 2601
Ph: (02) 6125 7265
Email: Steven.Crimp@anu.edu.au

Prof. Mark Howden
Climate Change Institute
Australian National University
Fenner School of Environment and Society
Building 141, Linnaeus Way, Action, ACT 2601
Ph: (02) 6125 7266
Email: Mark.Howden@anu.edu.au